Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31199327›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Mining of Textual Health Information from Reddit: Analysis of Chronic Diseases With Extracted Entities and Their Relations.

Vasiliki Foufi, Tatsawan Timakum, Christophe Gaudet-Blavignac, Christian Lovis, Min Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sentiment Analysis of Transsphenoidal Surgery in the Cushing's Subreddit.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Reddit users' questions and concerns about glaucoma.International ophthalmology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Informational Justice and Remote Working: All is Not Fair for Work at Home.Employee responsibilities and rights journal · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vasiliki Foufi *Division of Medical Information Sciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8625-0734
Tatsawan Timakum *Department of Library and Information Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9877-0323
Christophe Gaudet-Blavignac *Division of Medical Information Sciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6527-5898
Christian LovisDivision of Medical Information Sciences, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2681-8076
Min SongDepartment of Library and Information Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3255-1600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media platforms constitute a rich data source for natural language processing tasks such as named entity recognition, relation extraction, and sentiment analysis. In particular, social media platforms about health provide a different insight into patient's experiences with diseases and treatment than those found in the scientific literature.

objectiveThis paper aimed to report a study of entities related to chronic diseases and their relation in user-generated text posts. The major focus of our research is the study of biomedical entities found in health social media platforms and their relations and the way people suffering from chronic diseases express themselves.

methodsWe collected a corpus of 17,624 text posts from disease-specific subreddits of the social news and discussion website Reddit. For entity and relation extraction from this corpus, we employed the PKDE4J tool developed by Song et al (2015). PKDE4J is a text mining system that integrates dictionary-based entity extraction and rule-based relation extraction in a highly flexible and extensible framework.

resultsUsing PKDE4J, we extracted 2 types of entities and relations: biomedical entities and relations and subject-predicate-object entity relations. In total, 82,138 entities and 30,341 relation pairs were extracted from the Reddit dataset. The most highly mentioned entities were those related to oncological disease (2884 occurrences of cancer) and asthma (2180 occurrences). The relation pair anatomy-disease was the most frequent (5550 occurrences), the highest frequent entities in this pair being cancer and lymph. The manual validation of the extracted entities showed a very good performance of the system at the entity extraction task (3682/5151, 71.48% extracted entities were correctly labeled).

conclusionsThis study showed that people are eager to share their personal experience with chronic diseases on social media platforms despite possible privacy and security issues. The results reported in this paper are promising and demonstrate the need for more in-depth studies on the way patients with chronic diseases express themselves on social media platforms.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseData MiningFemaleHealth Information ExchangeHumansMaleSocial Mediachronic diseasedata miningsocial media

Identifiers

PMID31199327
PMCPMC6595941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.