Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31199304›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

Development of a Sensor-Based Behavioral Monitoring Solution to Support Dementia Care.

Julia Rosemary Thorpe, Birgitte Hysse Forchhammer, Anja M Maier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparisons Between GPS-based and Self-reported Life-space Mobility in Older Adults.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia Rosemary ThorpeEngineering Systems Group, DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2536-9889
Birgitte Hysse ForchhammerDepartment of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1796-0855
Anja M MaierEngineering Systems Group, DTU Management, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3890-6452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile and wearable technology presents exciting opportunities for monitoring behavior using widely available sensor data. This could support clinical research and practice aimed at improving quality of life among the growing number of people with dementia. However, it requires suitable tools for measuring behavior in a natural real-life setting that can be easily implemented by others.

objectiveThe objectives of this study were to develop and test a set of algorithms for measuring mobility and activity and to describe a technical setup for collecting the sensor data that these algorithms require using off-the-shelf devices.

methodsA mobility measurement module was developed to extract travel trajectories and home location from raw GPS (global positioning system) data and to use this information to calculate a set of spatial, temporal, and count-based mobility metrics. Activity measurement comprises activity bout extraction from recognized activity data and daily step counts. Location, activity, and step count data were collected using smartwatches and mobile phones, relying on open-source resources as far as possible for accessing data from device sensors. The behavioral monitoring solution was evaluated among 5 healthy subjects who simultaneously logged their movements for 1 week.

resultsThe evaluation showed that the behavioral monitoring solution successfully measures travel trajectories and mobility metrics from location data and extracts multimodal activity bouts during travel between locations. While step count could be used to indicate overall daily activity level, a concern was raised regarding device validity for step count measurement, which was substantially higher from the smartwatches than the mobile phones.

conclusionsThis study contributes to clinical research and practice by providing a comprehensive behavioral monitoring solution for use in a real-life setting that can be replicated for a range of applications where knowledge about individual mobility and activity is relevant.

Indexed as

ActigraphyAgedAged, 80 and overBehavior Observation TechniquesDementiaFemaleGeographic Information SystemsHumansMaleQuality of LifeWearable Electronic Devicesactivity trackersambulatory monitoringdementiahuman behaviormHealthpatient-centered carephysical activitysystem designwearable electronics devices

Identifiers

PMID31199304
PMCPMC6592513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.