Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31199302›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

Deep Learning Approaches to Detect Atrial Fibrillation Using Photoplethysmographic Signals: Algorithms Development Study.

Soonil Kwon, Joonki Hong, Eue-Keun Choi, Euijae Lee, David Earl Hostallero, Wan Ju Kang, Byunghwan Lee, Eui-Rim Jeong, Bon-Kwon Koo, Seil Oh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Soonil Kwon *Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4791-6855
Joonki Hong *School of Electrical Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8378-3332
Eue-Keun ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0411-6372
Euijae LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8735-5474
David Earl HostalleroSchool of Electrical Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1611-8332
Wan Ju KangSchool of Electrical Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8078-819X
Byunghwan LeeSky Labs Inc, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1930-6926
Eui-Rim JeongDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8708-6235
Bon-Kwon KooDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8188-3348
Seil OhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2504-9615
Yung YiSchool of Electrical Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6955-3135

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWearable devices have evolved as screening tools for atrial fibrillation (AF). A photoplethysmographic (PPG) AF detection algorithm was developed and applied to a convenient smartphone-based device with good accuracy. However, patients with paroxysmal AF frequently exhibit premature atrial complexes (PACs), which result in poor unmanned AF detection, mainly because of rule-based or handcrafted machine learning techniques that are limited in terms of diagnostic accuracy and reliability.

objectiveThis study aimed to develop deep learning (DL) classifiers using PPG data to detect AF from the sinus rhythm (SR) in the presence of PACs after successful cardioversion.

methodsWe examined 75 patients with AF who underwent successful elective direct-current cardioversion (DCC). Electrocardiogram and pulse oximetry data over a 15-min period were obtained before and after DCC and labeled as AF or SR. A 1-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN) were chosen as the 2 DL architectures. The PAC indicator estimated the burden of PACs on the PPG dataset. We defined a metric called the confidence level (CL) of AF or SR diagnosis and compared the CLs of true and false diagnoses. We also compared the diagnostic performance of 1D-CNN and RNN with previously developed AF detectors (support vector machine with root-mean-square of successive difference of RR intervals and Shannon entropy, autocorrelation, and ensemble by combining 2 previous methods) using 10 5-fold cross-validation processes.

resultsAmong the 14,298 training samples containing PPG data, 7157 samples were obtained during the post-DCC period. The PAC indicator estimated 29.79% (2132/7157) of post-DCC samples had PACs. The diagnostic accuracy of AF versus SR was 99.32% (70,925/71,410) versus 95.85% (68,602/71,570) in 1D-CNN and 98.27% (70,176/71,410) versus 96.04% (68,736/71,570) in RNN methods. The area under receiver operating characteristic curves of the 2 DL classifiers was 0.998 (95% CI 0.995-1.000) for 1D-CNN and 0.996 (95% CI 0.993-0.998) for RNN, which were significantly higher than other AF detectors (P<.001). If we assumed that the dataset could emulate a sufficient number of patients in training, both DL classifiers improved their diagnostic performances even further especially for the samples with a high burden of PACs. The average CLs for true versus false classification were 98.56% versus 78.75% for 1D-CNN and 98.37% versus 82.57% for RNN (P<.001 for all cases).

conclusionsNew DL classifiers could detect AF using PPG monitoring signals with high diagnostic accuracy even with frequent PACs and could outperform previously developed AF detectors. Although diagnostic performance decreased as the burden of PACs increased, performance improved when samples from more patients were trained. Moreover, the reliability of the diagnosis could be indicated by the CL. Wearable devices sensing PPG signals with DL classifiers should be validated as tools to screen for AF.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedAtrial FibrillationDeep LearningElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotoplethysmographyProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySeoulatrial fibrillationdeep learningdiagnosisphotoplethysmographypulse oximetry

Identifiers

PMID31199302
PMCPMC6592499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.