ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019
Deep Learning Approaches to Detect Atrial Fibrillation Using Photoplethysmographic Signals: Algorithms Development Study.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Cardiovascular-Related Diseases from Wearable Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Yonsei medical journal · 2022Pooled it
- Privacy-preserving adaptive arrhythmia monitoring with wearable ECG, smartphone PPG, and federated on-device learning.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Feasibility of smart ring-based remote monitoring in hospitalized patients: evaluation of signal transmission latency and data acquisition continuity.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Deep CNN-based detection of cardiac rhythm disorders using PPG signals from wearable devices.PloS one · 2025Article
- Identifying the presence of atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm using a dual-input mixed neural network with ECG coloring technology.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Learning From Alarms: A Robust Learning Approach for Accurate Photoplethysmography-Based Atrial Fibrillation Detection Using Eight Million Samples Labeled With Imprecise Arrhythmia Alarms.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2024Article
- Photoplethysmography based atrial fibrillation detection: a continually growing field.Physiological measurement · 2024Review
- Performance of Single-Lead Handheld Electrocardiograms for Atrial Fibrillation Screening in Primary Care: The VITAL-AF Trial.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Continuous cuffless blood pressure monitoring using photoplethysmography-based PPG2BP-net for high intrasubject blood pressure variations.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Log-Spectral Matching GAN: PPG-Based Atrial Fibrillation Detection can be Enhanced by GAN-Based Data Augmentation With Integration of Spectral Loss.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2023Article
- Machine learning in medicine: what clinicians should know.Singapore medical journal · 2023Review
- Intra Prediction Method for Depth Video Coding by Block Clustering through Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Visual Reassessment with Flux-Interval Plot Configuration after Automatic Classification for Accurate Atrial Fibrillation Detection by Photoplethysmography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Multiclass Arrhythmia Detection and Classification From Photoplethysmography Signals Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Article
- 2021 Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS) practice guidance on atrial fibrillation screening.Journal of arrhythmia · 2022Article
- A Real-Time PPG Peak Detection Method for Accurate Determination of Heart Rate during Sinus Rhythm and Cardiac Arrhythmia.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Machine Learning for Cardiovascular Outcomes From Wearable Data: Systematic Review From a Technology Readiness Level Point of View.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Review
- Recent Advances in Materials and Flexible Sensors for Arrhythmia Detection.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Contactless facial video recording with deep learning models for the detection of atrial fibrillation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Machine learning for atrial fibrillation risk prediction in patients with sleep apnea and coronary artery disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWearable devices have evolved as screening tools for atrial fibrillation (AF). A photoplethysmographic (PPG) AF detection algorithm was developed and applied to a convenient smartphone-based device with good accuracy. However, patients with paroxysmal AF frequently exhibit premature atrial complexes (PACs), which result in poor unmanned AF detection, mainly because of rule-based or handcrafted machine learning techniques that are limited in terms of diagnostic accuracy and reliability.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop deep learning (DL) classifiers using PPG data to detect AF from the sinus rhythm (SR) in the presence of PACs after successful cardioversion.
methodsWe examined 75 patients with AF who underwent successful elective direct-current cardioversion (DCC). Electrocardiogram and pulse oximetry data over a 15-min period were obtained before and after DCC and labeled as AF or SR. A 1-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and recurrent neural network (RNN) were chosen as the 2 DL architectures. The PAC indicator estimated the burden of PACs on the PPG dataset. We defined a metric called the confidence level (CL) of AF or SR diagnosis and compared the CLs of true and false diagnoses. We also compared the diagnostic performance of 1D-CNN and RNN with previously developed AF detectors (support vector machine with root-mean-square of successive difference of RR intervals and Shannon entropy, autocorrelation, and ensemble by combining 2 previous methods) using 10 5-fold cross-validation processes.
resultsAmong the 14,298 training samples containing PPG data, 7157 samples were obtained during the post-DCC period. The PAC indicator estimated 29.79% (2132/7157) of post-DCC samples had PACs. The diagnostic accuracy of AF versus SR was 99.32% (70,925/71,410) versus 95.85% (68,602/71,570) in 1D-CNN and 98.27% (70,176/71,410) versus 96.04% (68,736/71,570) in RNN methods. The area under receiver operating characteristic curves of the 2 DL classifiers was 0.998 (95% CI 0.995-1.000) for 1D-CNN and 0.996 (95% CI 0.993-0.998) for RNN, which were significantly higher than other AF detectors (P<.001). If we assumed that the dataset could emulate a sufficient number of patients in training, both DL classifiers improved their diagnostic performances even further especially for the samples with a high burden of PACs. The average CLs for true versus false classification were 98.56% versus 78.75% for 1D-CNN and 98.37% versus 82.57% for RNN (P<.001 for all cases).
conclusionsNew DL classifiers could detect AF using PPG monitoring signals with high diagnostic accuracy even with frequent PACs and could outperform previously developed AF detectors. Although diagnostic performance decreased as the burden of PACs increased, performance improved when samples from more patients were trained. Moreover, the reliability of the diagnosis could be indicated by the CL. Wearable devices sensing PPG signals with DL classifiers should be validated as tools to screen for AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.