ReviewJMIR medical education2019
Applications and Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Integrative Review.
Review in JMIR medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 274 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
274 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Medical Students' Attitudes, Perceptions, and Self-Reported Familiarity With AI in Health Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- AI-Powered Simulation for Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of AI-enhanced virtual patients for psychiatric interview training in health professions education: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Development of AI competencies within the medical curriculum.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Medical undergraduate students' readiness and anxiety toward artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Advancements in artificial intelligence transforming medical education: a comprehensive overview.Medical education online · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of AI-assisted medical education for Chinese undergraduate medical students: a meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Integrating artificial intelligence into medical education: a narrative systematic review of current applications, challenges, and future directions.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Technology Acceptance Model in Medical Education: Systematic Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the Performance of ChatGPT on Board-Style Examination Questions in Ophthalmology: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical systems · 2025Pooled it
- The Roles of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching Anatomy: A Systematic Review.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Pooled it
- AI in the Health Sector: Systematic Review of Key Skills for Future Health Professionals.JMIR medical education · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of the impact of artificial intelligence on educational outcomes in health professions education.BMC medical education · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of generative AI in medical education in India: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- DeepSeek-assisted problem-based learning for glaucoma education in an undergraduate ophthalmology clerkship: a randomized educational pilot study.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Integrating large language models into prostate cancer training: evidence from comparative benchmarking and a pilot randomized trial.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- The effect of artificial intelligence-based scenarios on the clinical education of rehabilitation students: an anatomy-based randomized controlled study.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Enhancing clinical skills in pediatric trainees: a comparative study of ChatGPT-assisted and traditional teaching methods.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- Predictive analysis in acute ischemic stroke imaging.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Predictors of Intentions to Learn and Adopt Medical Artificial Intelligence Among Healthcare Professionals in Ghana: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
214 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in 1955, the applications of AI have increased over the years within a rapidly changing digital landscape where public expectations are on the rise, fed by social media, industry leaders, and medical practitioners. However, there has been little interest in AI in medical education until the last two decades, with only a recent increase in the number of publications and citations in the field. To our knowledge, thus far, a limited number of articles have discussed or reviewed the current use of AI in medical education.
objectiveThis study aims to review the current applications of AI in medical education as well as the challenges of implementing AI in medical education.
methodsMedline (Ovid), EBSCOhost Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) and Education Source, and Web of Science were searched with explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full text of the selected articles was analyzed using the Extension of Technology Acceptance Model and the Diffusions of Innovations theory. Data were subsequently pooled together and analyzed quantitatively.
resultsA total of 37 articles were identified. Three primary uses of AI in medical education were identified: learning support (n=32), assessment of students' learning (n=4), and curriculum review (n=1). The main reasons for use of AI are its ability to provide feedback and a guided learning pathway and to decrease costs. Subgroup analysis revealed that medical undergraduates are the primary target audience for AI use. In addition, 34 articles described the challenges of AI implementation in medical education; two main reasons were identified: difficulty in assessing the effectiveness of AI in medical education and technical challenges while developing AI applications.
conclusionsThe primary use of AI in medical education was for learning support mainly due to its ability to provide individualized feedback. Little emphasis was placed on curriculum review and assessment of students' learning due to the lack of digitalization and sensitive nature of examinations, respectively. Big data manipulation also warrants the need to ensure data integrity. Methodological improvements are required to increase AI adoption by addressing the technical difficulties of creating an AI application and using novel methods to assess the effectiveness of AI. To better integrate AI into the medical profession, measures should be taken to introduce AI into the medical school curriculum for medical professionals to better understand AI algorithms and maximize its use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.