Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31199289›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2019

Oncofertility Decision Support Resources for Women of Reproductive Age: Systematic Review.

Brittany Speller, Selena Micic, Corinne Daly, Lebei Pi, Tari Little, Nancy N Baxter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Developing a web-based oncofertility tool for reproductive-age women with breast cancer based on social support framework.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brittany Speller *Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5689-2031
Selena Micic *Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1225-3764
Corinne Daly *Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1210-6246
Lebei Pi *Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8188-616X
Tari Little *Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5969-7645
Nancy N Baxter *Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4793-4620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer treatments have the potential to cause infertility among women of reproductive age. Many cancer patients do not receive sufficient oncofertility information or referrals to reproductive specialists prior to starting cancer treatment. While health care providers cite lack of awareness on the available oncofertility resources, the majority of cancer patients use the internet as a resource to find additional information to supplement discussions with their providers.

objectiveOur aim was to identify and characterize Web-based oncofertility decision aids and health education materials accessible for women of reproductive age with a diagnosis of any cancer.

methodsWe searched five databases and the gray literature for the years 1994-2018. The developer and content information for identified resources was extracted. Each resource underwent a quality assessment.

resultsWe identified 31 open access resources including 4 decision aids and 27 health educational materials. The most common fertility preservation options listed in the resources included embryo (31/31, 100%), egg (31, 100%), and ovarian tissue freezing (30, 97%). Notably, approximately one-third (11, 35%) contained references and 5 (16%) had a reading level of grade 8 or below. Resources were of varying quality; two decision aids from Australia and the Netherlands, two booklets from Australia and the United Kingdom, and three websites from Canada and the United States rated as the highest quality.

conclusionsThis comprehensive review characterizes numerous resources available to support patients and providers with oncofertility information, counseling, and decision making. More focus is required to improve the awareness and the access of existing resources among patients and providers. Providers can address patient information needs by leveraging or adapting existing resources to support clinical discussions and their specific patient population.

Indexed as

cancerdecision aidsdecision-makingfertilityhealth education materialspatient educationyoung women

Identifiers

PMID31199289
PMCPMC6592478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.