Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31199242›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Protein quality control in the nucleolus safeguards recovery of epigenetic regulators after heat shock.

Maria Azkanaz, Aida Rodríguez López, Bauke de Boer, Wouter Huiting, Pierre-Olivier Angrand, Edo Vellenga, Harm H Kampinga, Steven Bergink, Joost Ha Martens, Jan Jacob Schuringa and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mechanobiology of the Nucleolus.Biology of the cell · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria AzkanazDepartment of Experimental Hematology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Aida Rodríguez LópezDepartment of Experimental Hematology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Bauke de BoerDepartment of Experimental Hematology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Wouter HuitingDepartment of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Pierre-Olivier AngrandCell Plasticity & Cancer, Inserm U908, University of Lille, Lille, France.
Edo VellengaDepartment of Experimental Hematology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Harm H KampingaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Steven BerginkDepartment of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Joost Ha MartensDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science and Medicine, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Jan Jacob Schuringa *Department of Experimental Hematology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8452-8555
Vincent van den Boom *Department of Experimental Hematology, Cancer Research Center Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1992-9608
University Medical Center Groningen · NLHarvard University · USInserm · FR

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding RUG 2014-6832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance of epigenetic modifiers is of utmost importance to preserve the epigenome and consequently appropriate cellular functioning. Here, we analyzed Polycomb group protein (PcG) complex integrity in response to heat shock (HS). Upon HS, various Polycomb Repressive Complex (PRC)1 and PRC2 subunits, including CBX proteins, but also other chromatin regulators, are found to accumulate in the nucleolus. In parallel, binding of PRC1/2 to target genes is strongly reduced, coinciding with a dramatic loss of H2AK119ub and H3K27me3 marks. Nucleolar-accumulated CBX proteins are immobile, but remarkably both CBX protein accumulation and loss of PRC1/2 epigenetic marks are reversible. This post-heat shock recovery of pan-nuclear CBX protein localization and reinstallation of epigenetic marks is HSP70 dependent. Our findings demonstrate that the nucleolus is an essential protein quality control center, which is indispensable for recovery of epigenetic regulators and maintenance of the epigenome after heat shock.

Indexed as

Heat-Shock ResponseCell LineCell NucleolusEpigenesis, GeneticHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansPolycomb Repressive Complex 1Polycomb Repressive Complex 2HSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsPolycomb Repressive Complex 1Polycomb Repressive Complex 2biochemistrychemical biologychromosomesepigeneticsgene expressionheat shockhumanleukemianucleolusPolycombprotein quality control

Identifiers

PMID31199242
PMCPMC6570483
OpenAlexW2949135464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.