Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31199137›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2019

Transition State Asymmetry in C-H Bond Cleavage by Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer.

Julia W Darcy, Scott S Kolmar, James M Mayer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Disentangling Driving Force Effects, Polar Effects,Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Guide to Tris(4-Substituted)-triphenylmethyl Radicals.The Journal of organic chemistry · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Independent Tuning of the pInorganic chemistry · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. C(spChemical science · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia W DarcyDepartment of Chemistry , Yale University , New Haven , Connecticut 06520-8107 , United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0633-8187
Scott S KolmarDepartment of Chemistry , Yale University , New Haven , Connecticut 06520-8107 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7797-700X
James M MayerDepartment of Chemistry , Yale University , New Haven , Connecticut 06520-8107 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3943-5250

Funding

UNDERSTANDING METAL MEDIATED C-H AND O-H BOND OXIDATIONSR01GM050422 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MAYER, JAMES M · 1995 to 2020
$6.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The selective transformation of C-H bonds is a longstanding challenge in modern chemistry. A recent report details C-H oxidation via multiple-site concerted proton-electron transfer (MS-CPET), where the proton and electron in the C-H bond are transferred to separate sites. Reactivity at a specific C-H bond was achieved by appropriate positioning of an internal benzoate base. Here, we extend that report to reactions of a series of molecules with differently substituted fluorenyl-benzoates and varying outer-sphere oxidants. These results probe the fundamental rate versus driving force relationships in this MS-CPET reaction at carbon by separately modulating the driving force for the proton and electron transfer components. The rate constants depend strongly on the p

Indexed as

ProtonsBenzoatesCarbonDensity Functional TheoryElectron TransportFluorenesHydrogenHydrogen BondingOxidantsOxidation-ReductionThermodynamicsBenzoatesCarbonFluorenesHydrogenOxidantsProtons

Identifiers

PMID31199137
PMCPMC7241443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.