Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31198945›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2019

Protein Valuation in Food Choice Is Positively Associated with Lean Mass in Older Adults.

Charlotte M Buckley, Sophie Austin, Bernard M Corfe, Mark A Green, Alexandra M Johnstone, Emma J Stevenson, Elizabeth A Williams, Jeffrey M Brunstrom

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sarcopenia: Molecular Pathways and Potential Targets for Intervention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte M BuckleyNutrition and Behaviour Unit, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Sophie AustinNutrition and Behaviour Unit, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Bernard M CorfeDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Mark A GreenDepartment of Geography and Planning, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Alexandra M JohnstoneRowett Institute, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Emma J StevensonHuman Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Medical School, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth A WilliamsDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey M BrunstromNutrition and Behaviour Unit, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/P020941/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCalorie for calorie, protein is more satiating than carbohydrate or fat. However, it remains unclear whether humans perceive calories derived from these macronutrients equally and whether lean mass is associated with a tendency to "value" protein when dietary decisions are made.

objectivesThis study aimed to determine the test-retest reliability of a novel method for quantifying macronutrient valuations in human volunteers and to determine whether "protein valuation" is associated with a higher fat-free mass index (FFMI) in older adults.

methodsA 2-alternative, forced-choice task in which 25 foods were compared in 300 trials was undertaken in 2 studies. In study 1, participants (age range 19-71 y, n = 92) attended 2 test sessions, spaced 1 wk apart. In study 2, older adults (age range 40-85 y; n = 91) completed the food-choice task and assessed the test foods for liking, expected satiety, and perceived healthiness. Body composition and habitual protein intake were assessed in both studies. Data were analyzed through the use of individual binomial logistic regressions and multilevel binomial logistic regressions.

resultsIn study 1, measures of macronutrient valuation showed excellent test-retest reliability; responses in the forced-choice task were highly correlated (week 1 compared with week 2; protein, r = 0.83, P < 0.001; carbohydrate, r = 0.90, P < 0.001; fat, r = 0.90, P < 0.001). Calorie for calorie, protein and carbohydrate were stronger predictors of choice than fat (P < 0.001). In study 2, protein was a stronger predictor than both carbohydrate (P = 0.039) and fat (P = 0.003), and a positive interaction was observed between protein valuation and FFMI (OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.38, 1.95; P < 0.001). This was the case after controlling for age, gender, liking for foods, and habitual protein consumption.

conclusionsTogether, these findings demonstrate that adult humans value calories derived from protein, carbohydrate, and fat differently, and that the tendency to value protein is associated with greater lean mass in older adults.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody CompositionDietary ProteinsDiet, HealthyEnergy IntakeFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrientsNutritive ValuePerceptionDietary ProteinsNutrientsagingbody compositionfat-free mass indexfood choicelean massprotein valuationsarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID31198945
PMCPMC6825819
OpenAlexW2952185592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.