Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31198879›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2019

Barriers to recruitment of children with cerebral palsy in a trial of home-based training.

L W M E Beckers, E A A Rameckers, R J E M Smeets, J J W van der Burg, P B M Aarts, M L A P Schnackers, Y J M Janssen-Potten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

L W M E BeckersDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
E A A RameckersDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
R J E M SmeetsDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
J J W van der BurgDepartment of Pediatric Rehabilitation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
P B M AartsDepartment of Pediatric Rehabilitation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
M L A P SchnackersCentre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Adelante, Hoensbroek, the Netherlands.
Y J M Janssen-PottenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many trials fail to include the targeted number of participants, causing scientific and ethical problems. The COAD trial of home-based training programs (HBTPs) for children with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) encountered recruitment problems, even though the parent-delivered home-based approach complies with recent health-care developments in the Netherlands. The current project aimed to identify the barriers to recruitment in the COAD trial. This summative, multidimensional evaluation comprised informal conversational interviews in which stakeholders who had been involved reflected on the factors that impeded successful recruitment of participants into the COAD trial. Barriers to implementation and recruitment were clustered according to the constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Member checking validated the findings. A total of 41 stakeholders contributed to the evaluation. Barriers to the implementation of the HBTPs were identified within every domain of the CFIR (intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and process). Parent-delivered home-based training was perceived as highly complex and in conflict with the pressures on and the needs of parents. Many parents preferred the alternative center-based group interventions. The involvement of a resonance group was highly valued, and opportunities for further enhancements emerged. Additionally, the importance of research consortia was emphasized. The appropriateness of the RCT as the study design was criticized. The findings of this study are summarized in a tool which provides a dozen directions for the successful recruitment of participants in pediatric rehabilitation research.

Indexed as

Cerebral palsyHome-based trainingImplementationMultidimensional evaluationRandomized controlled trialRecruitment

Identifiers

PMID31198879
PMCPMC6556814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.