ArticleHeliyon2019
Simple mix-and-read assays for the determination of baclofen in pharmaceutical formulation.
Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study demonstrates three simple and inexpensive spectrophotometric mix-and-read assays for the determination of the skeletal muscle relaxant, baclofen (BAC) in pharmaceutical formulations. The proposed methods are based on the reaction of the primary amine group of BAC with various derivatizing reagents to yield different colored products. Method I depends on the reaction of BAC with vanillin in borate buffer pH 11.5 to give a yellow colored product with maximum absorbance at 401 nm. While method II describes the reaction with eosin Y in citric-phosphate buffer pH 2.2 forming an orange-red product measured at 548 nm. Method III depends on Hantzsch condensation reaction that yields a yellow product measured at 339 nm. Different experimental variables influencing development and stability of the obtained colored product are optimized. Validation of the three methods regarding linearity, ranges, precision, accuracy and limits of detection and quantification was performed. Regression analysis showed good linearity over the concentration ranges of 10-35, 5-20 and 5-25 μg/mL for methods I, II and III, respectively with correlation coefficient values not less than 0.999. Additionally, detection limits of BAC are 1.58, 0.94 and 0.79 μg/mL for methods I, II and III, respectively. Finally, the suggested procedures are successfully used for assay of BAC in its tablets. The main advantages of the proposed mix-and-read assays are being inexpensive and rapid with no requirement for laborious extraction techniques with equivalent or superior sensitivity compared to other published spectrophotometric procedures. Such advantages promote the suggested methods for the high throughput assay of BAC dosage forms, a critical component in quality control studies for pharmaceutical industries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.