Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31198871›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2019

Detailed structural assessment of healthy interventricular septum in the presence of remodeling infarct in the free wall - A finite element model.

Fulufhelo Nemavhola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fulufhelo NemavholaDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa, Florida, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComputational modelling may improve the fundamental understanding of various mechanisms of diseases more particularly related to clinical challenges. In this study the effect of remodeling infarct presence in the left ventricle on the interventricular septal wall is studied using the finite element methods.

methodsIn this study, two rat heart (one model with healthy myocardium and one model with remodeling free wall and healthy septal wall) with magnetic resonance imaging data was gathered to reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) rat heart models. 3D data points from Segment® were imported into SolidEdge® for creation of 3D rat heart models. Abaqus® was used for finite element modeling.

resultsThe strain in the healthy interventricular septum of the infarcted left ventricle wall increased when compared to the healthy interventricular septum in the healthy left ventricle. Similarly, the average stress in the healthy left ventricle was observed to have increased on the healthy the interventricular septum where the free wall is subjected to remodeling infarct. When comparing the infarcted models to the healthy model, it was found that the average strain had greatly increased by up to 50.0 %.

conclusionsThe remodeling infarct in the left ventricle has an impact on the healthy interventricular septal wall. Even though the interventricular septal wall was modelled as healthy, it was observed that it has undergone considerable changes in stresses and strains in circumferential and longitudinal direction. The observed changes in myocardial stresses and strains may result in poor global functioning of the heart.

Indexed as

BioengineeringBiomedical engineeringBi-ventricular heart modelComputational mechanicsFinite element modellingMechanicsMyocardial strainMyocardial stress

Identifiers

PMID31198871
PMCPMC6556880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.