Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31198790›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology research2019

Comparison of Inhibitory Effects of Safflower Decoction and Safflower Injection on Protein and mRNA Expressions of iNOS and IL-1

Hui Liao, Yuanping Li, Xiaoru Zhai, Bin Zheng, Linda Banbury, Xiaoyun Zhao, Rongshan Li

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Total Flavonoids fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Network Pharmacology Study to Explore the Underlying Mechanism of Safflower (Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hui LiaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030012, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6325-062X
Yuanping LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030012, China.
Xiaoru ZhaiChina Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan 030006, China.
Bin ZhengDepartment of Pharmacy, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030012, China.
Linda BanburyNSW Health Pathology, Lismore Base Hospital, Hunter Street, Lismore, 2480 NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5348-9952
Xiaoyun ZhaoSchool of Pharmacy, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China.
Rongshan LiDepartment of Nephrology, Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Kidney Disease Institute, No. 29 Shuangtasi Street, Taiyuan, 030012 Shanxi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8082-4389
Shanxi Medical University · CNLismore Base Hospital · AUNational Institute for Radiological Protection · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSafflower has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. The two forms of preparations for safflower which are widely used in China are injection and decoction. The first step of the process for preparing an injection involves extracting safflower with water, which actually yields a decoction. This study is intended to investigate how the preparation process influences the anti-inflammatory activity of safflower

methodsFive samples, including a decoction (sample 1) and an injection (sample 5) of safflower, were prepared according to the national standard WS3-B-3825-98-2012 and were analyzed by the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) method and the 1,1-diphenyl-2-trinitrophenylhydrazine (DPPH) method for comparison. Sample 1 and sample 5 were further tested by the Griess assay and ELISA for their effects on nitric oxide (NO) production and interleukin- (IL-) 1

resultsSample 5 showed a significantly higher ORAC value and a lower half inhibitory concentration (IC

conclusionsResults of this study demonstrate that the safflower injection prepared according to the national standard has a significant effect of suppressing protein and mRNA expressions of iNOS and IL-1

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsCarthamus tinctoriusDrug CompoundingDrugs, Chinese HerbalFree Radical ScavengersInterleukin-1betaMacrophagesMiceNitric OxideNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIOxygen Radical Absorbance CapacityPicratesRAW 264.7 CellsRNA, Messenger1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazylAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsDrugs, Chinese HerbalFree Radical ScavengersInterleukin-1betaNitric OxideNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIPicratesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID31198790
PMCPMC6526513
OpenAlexW2943646992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.