ArticleHip & pelvis2019
Hip Arthroscopy of a Painful Hip with Borderline Dysplasia.
Article in Hip & pelvis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Mid- to long-term outcomes of capsular management in hip arthroscopy for FAIS: A multilevel meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- Capsular management strategies in hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A multilevel meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Periacetabular osteotomy versus hip arthroscopy in patients with borderline developmental dysplasia of the hip: A systematic review and multi-level meta-analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Hip preservation surgery for borderline and frank dysplasia: an overview of systematic reviews.EFORT open reviews · 2024Review
- Hip arthroscopy and T-shaped capsular plication for the treatment of borderline dysplasia: a minimum 2-year follow-up.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022Article
- Ultrasound-guided hydrodilatation for adhesive capsulitis of the hip is a safe and effective treatment.International orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Comparison Between Hip Arthroscopic Surgery and Periacetabular Osteotomy for the Treatment of Patients With Borderline Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Review
- Successful return to sport in patients with symptomatic borderline dysplasia following hip arthroscopy and T-shaped capsular plication.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021Article
- Arthroscopic management with labral preservation, femoral osteoplasty, and capsular plication in patients with borderline hip dysplasia. Results of a matched-cohort study at minimum two year follow-up.International orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Time taken to resume driving following hip arthroscopy.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2020Article
- Hip Arthroscopy of a Painful Hip with Borderline Dysplasia: Letter to the Editor.Hip & pelvis · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHip arthroscopy has been considered for treating hip dysplasia; however, its efficacy is still a matter of controversy. Here, we report outcomes of patients with borderline dysplasia treated with a contemporary hip arthroscopy technique. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-seven hips with borderline hip dysplasia were treated using hip arthroscopy. Patients underwent procedures to correct torn labrums or ligamentum teres with additional procedure on the acetabular capsule. Patient outcomes were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) and patient satisfaction. Risk factors for poor prognosis were also investigated.
resultsThe mean follow up period was 25.9 months. At the last follow up, mean VAS score decreased from 6.1±1.6 to 3.5±2.8 (
conclusionThe results of the current study indicate that arthroscopic management may be beneficial for a subset of patients with borderline dysplasia; however, the dissatisfaction rate associated with this treatment approach may be as high as 40%. The poor preoperative pain score appears to be the sole indicator for poor outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.