Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31198708›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2019

Need for a universal thalassemia screening programme in India? A public health perspective.

Arulmani Thiyagarajan, Sudip Bhattacharya, Neha Sharma, Abhay Srivastava, Dipak Kumar Dhar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arulmani ThiyagarajanPublic Health Scientist, SRM University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sudip BhattacharyaDepartment of Community Medicine, HIMS, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Neha SharmaDepartment of Community Medicine, HIMS, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Abhay SrivastavaDepartment of Community Medicine, HIMS, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Dipak Kumar DharDepartment of Physiology, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
SRM University · INSwami Rama Himalayan University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thalassemia is one of the significant public health concerns as the carrier rate and disease numbers are increasing worldwide. The increase in number is because of consanguineous marriage which has a deep-rooted norm among many people globally. Besides various clinical and psychological problems associated with thalassemia, a lifelong treatment aspect makes it much more difficult for a person or family to sustain with thalassemia or thalassemia-affected children. Though the government has come up with a screening programme for thalassemia, given the fact that it is optional, people tend to ignore it. Examples from Pakistan and Iran remind us to have a mandatory prenatal screening programme which is very much cost-effective. With a highly recommended notion, we suggest that it should be universal to have an antenatal screening programme to avert thalassemia-related deaths.

Indexed as

Genetic disorderpublic healthscreeningthalassemia

Identifiers

PMID31198708
PMCPMC6559078
OpenAlexW2948183786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.