ArticleMethodsX2019
Molecular Interaction Network Approach (MINA) identifies association of novel candidate disease genes.
Article in MethodsX, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular Interaction Network Approach (MINA) was used to elucidate candidate disease genes. The approach was implemented to identify novel gene association with commonly known autoimmune diseases [1]. In MINA, we evaluated the hypothesis that "network proximity" within a whole genome molecular interaction network can be used to inform the search for multigene inheritance. There are now numerous examples of gene discoveries based upon network proximity between novel and previously identified disease genes (Yin et al., 2017 [2], Wang et al., 2011 [3], and Barrenas et al., 2009 [4]). This study extends the application of interaction networks to the interrogation of Genome Wide Association studies: first, by showing that a group of nine autoimmune diseases (AuD) genes "seed genes", are connected in a highly non-random manner within a whole genome network; and second, by showing that the minimal number of connecting genes required to connect a maximal number of AuD candidate genes are highly enriched as candidate genes for AuD predisposing mutations. The findings imply that a threshold number of candidate genes for any heritable disorder can be used to "seed" a molecular interaction network that •Serves to validate the disease status of closely associated seed genes•Identifies genes that are highly enriched as novel candidate disease genes•Provides a strategy for elucidation of epistatic gene x gene interactions The method could provide a critical toll for understanding the genetic architecture of common traits and disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.