Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31198635›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Large-scale gene expression analysis reveals robust gene signatures for prognosis prediction in lung adenocarcinoma.

Yiyan Songyang, Wei Zhu, Cong Liu, Lin-Lin Li, Wei Hu, Qun Zhou, Han Zhang, Wen Li, Dejia Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yiyan SongyangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wei ZhuDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Cong LiuDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Lin-Lin LiDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wei HuDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Qun ZhouDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Han ZhangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wen LiDepartment of Emergency, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Dejia LiDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Wuhan University · CNRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. High mortality in LUAD motivates us to stratify the patients into high- and low-risk groups, which is beneficial for the clinicians to design a personalized therapeutic regimen. To robustly predict the risk, we identified a set of robust prognostic gene signatures and critical pathways based on ten gene expression datasets by the meta-analysis-based Cox regression model, 25 of which were selected as predictors of multivariable Cox regression model by MMPC algorithm. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified the Aurora-A pathway, the Aurora-B pathway, and the FOXM1 transcription factor network as prognostic pathways in LUAD. Moreover, the three prognostic pathways were also the biological processes of G2-M transition, suggesting that hyperactive G2-M transition in cell cycle was an indicator of poor prognosis in LUAD. The validation in the independent datasets suggested that overall survival differences were observed not only in all LUAD patients, but also in those with a specific TNM stage, gender, and age group. The comprehensive analysis demonstrated that prognostic signatures and the prognostic model by the large-scale gene expression analysis were more robust than models built by single data based gene signatures in LUAD overall survival prediction.

Indexed as

Hyperactive G2-M transitionLarge-scale gene expression analysisLung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)MMPC algorithmOverall survival

Identifiers

PMID31198635
PMCPMC6553445
OpenAlexW2947149148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.