Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31198578›Full record

ArticleFungal biology and biotechnology2019

Increasing access to microfluidics for studying fungi and other branched biological structures.

Larry J Millet, Jayde Aufrecht, Jessy Labbé, Jessie Uehling, Rytas Vilgalys, Myka L Estes, Cora Miquel Guennoc, Aurélie Deveau, Stefan Olsson, Gregory Bonito and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Lab on a chip · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Larry J Millet1Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, MS 6445, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6443-2505
Jayde Aufrecht2The Bredesen Center, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA.
Jessy Labbé1Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, MS 6445, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0368-2054
Jessie Uehling5Biology Department, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
Rytas Vilgalys5Biology Department, Duke University, Box 90338, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
Myka L Estes7The Center for Neuroscience, University of California Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95618 USA.
Cora Miquel Guennoc1Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, MS 6445, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA.
Aurélie Deveau8Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA), Centre INRA-Lorraine, 54280 Champenoux, France.
Stefan OlssonFujian Agricultural and Forestry University, Fuzhou City, 350002 Fujian Province China.
Gregory Bonito10Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA.
Mitchel J Doktycz1Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, MS 6445, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4856-8343
Scott T Retterer1Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, MS 6445, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8534-1979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrofluidic systems are well-suited for studying mixed biological communities for improving industrial processes of fermentation, biofuel production, and pharmaceutical production. The results of which have the potential to resolve the underlying mechanisms of growth and transport in these complex branched living systems. Microfluidics provide controlled environments and improved optical access for real-time and high-resolution imaging studies that allow high-content and quantitative analyses. Studying growing branched structures and the dynamics of cellular interactions with both biotic and abiotic cues provides context for molecule production and genetic manipulations. To make progress in this arena, technical and logistical barriers must be overcome to more effectively deploy microfluidics in biological disciplines. A principle technical barrier is the process of assembling, sterilizing, and hydrating the microfluidic system; the lack of the necessary equipment for the preparatory process is a contributing factor to this barrier. To improve access to microfluidic systems, we present the development, characterization, and implementation of a microfluidics assembly and packaging process that builds on self-priming point-of-care principles to achieve "ready-to-use microfluidics."

resultsWe present results from domestic and international collaborations using novel microfluidic architectures prepared with a unique packaging protocol. We implement this approach by focusing primarily on filamentous fungi; we also demonstrate the utility of this approach for collaborations on plants and neurons. In this work we (1) determine the shelf-life of ready-to-use microfluidics, (2) demonstrate biofilm-like colonization on fungi, (3) describe bacterial motility on fungal hyphae (fungal highway), (4) report material-dependent bacterial-fungal colonization, (5) demonstrate germination of vacuum-sealed

conclusionsThis pre-packaging approach provides a simple, one step process to initiate microfluidics in any setting for fungal studies, bacteria-fungal interactions, and other biological inquiries. This process improves access to microfluidics for controlling biological microenvironments, and further enabling visual and quantitative analysis of fungal cultures.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisBacterial-fungal interactionsBranching biologyCell cultureFungiMicrofluidicsNeuronPlant root

Identifiers

PMID31198578
PMCPMC6556955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.