ArticleConservation physiology2019
Drought-induced dieback of
Article in Conservation physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying Carbon Losses Associated with Photorespiration and Drought Stress in Two Dominant Mediterranean Pine Species.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hydraulic architecture, height-related changes in photosynthesis and seasonal positive pressure declines in bamboo: implications for top dieback.Annals of botany · 2025Article
- Prescribed burning has negligible effects on the plant-soil system in Pinus sylvestris L. forests of the European Alps.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Consistent decrease in conifer embolism resistance from the stem apex to base resulting from axial trends in tracheid and pit traits.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Turgor loss point and vulnerability to xylem embolism predict species-specific risk of drought-induced decline of urban trees.Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2022Article
- Potential Impacts of Climate Change on the Habitat Suitability of the Dominant Tree Species in Greece.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Stem canker pathogenFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Cavitation fatigue in conifers: a study on eight European species.Plant physiology · 2021Article
- Modeling Climate Impacts on Tree Growth to Assess Tree Vulnerability to Drought During Forest Dieback.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Abscisic Acid Mediates Drought and Salt Stress Responses inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Stem Shading Promotes Mannitol Accumulation in the Bark of Fraxinus ornus and Prevents Sucrose Transport in Roots Under Drought.Physiologia plantarumArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ongoing climate change is apparently increasing tree mortality rates, and understanding mechanisms of drought-induced tree decline can improve mortality projections. Differential drought impact on conspecific individuals within a population has been reported, but no clear mechanistic explanation for this pattern has emerged. Following a severe drought (summer 2012), we monitored over a 3-year period healthy (H) and declining (D)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.