Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31198546›Full record

ArticleClinical kidney journal2019

Should donors who have used marijuana be considered candidates for living kidney donation?

David Ruckle, Mohamed Keheila, Benjamin West, Pedro Baron, Rafael Villicana, Braden Mattison, Alex Thomas, Jerry Thomas, Michael De Vera, Arputharaj Kore and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The growing dilemma of legalized cannabis and heart transplantation.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2021
    Review
  6. Cannabis and Cigarette Use Before and After Living Kidney Donation.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2021
    Article
  7. The nephrologist's guide to cannabis and cannabinoids.Current opinion in nephrology and hypertension · 2020
    Review
  8. The newClinical kidney journal · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David RuckleDepartment of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Mohamed KeheilaDepartment of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Benjamin WestDepartment of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Pedro BaronDepartment of Transplant and Transplant Nephrology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Rafael VillicanaDepartment of Transplant and Transplant Nephrology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Braden MattisonDepartment of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Alex ThomasDepartment of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Jerry ThomasDepartment of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Michael De VeraDepartment of Transplant and Transplant Nephrology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Arputharaj KoreDepartment of Transplant and Transplant Nephrology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Philip WaiDepartment of Transplant and Transplant Nephrology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
D Duane BaldwinDepartment of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Loma Linda University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of marijuana in the USA has been steadily increasing over the last 10 years. This study is the first to investigate the effect of marijuana use by live kidney donors upon outcomes in both donors and recipients.

methodsLiving kidney donor transplants performed between January 2000 and May 2016 in a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. Donor and recipient groups were each divided into two groups by donor marijuana usage. Outcomes in donor and recipient groups were compared using

resultsThis was 294 living renal donor medical records were reviewed including 31 marijuana-using donors (MUD) and 263 non-MUDs (NMUD). It was 230 living kidney recipient records were reviewed including 27 marijuana kidney recipients (MKRs) and 203 non-MKRs (NMKR). There was no difference in donor or recipient perioperative characteristics or postoperative outcomes based upon donor marijuana use (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). There was no difference in renal function between NMUD and MUD groups and no long-term difference in kidney allograft function between NMKR and MKR groups.

conclusionsConsidering individuals with a history of marijuana use for living kidney donation could increase the donor pool and yield acceptable outcomes.

Indexed as

cannabisliving donorsnephrectomyoutcomesrenal transplantation

Identifiers

PMID31198546
PMCPMC6543962
OpenAlexW2900306658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.