Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31198330›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2019

Potluri Leela Ravishankar, Vandana Vijayan, Sunanda K Rao, Saravanan A Vadivelu, Damodaran Narayanaswamy, Surya Teja

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Potluri Leela RavishankarDepartment of periodontics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Potheri, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vandana VijayanDepartment of periodontics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Potheri, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sunanda K RaoDepartment of periodontics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Potheri, Tamil Nadu, India.
Saravanan A VadiveluDepartment of periodontics, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Potheri, Tamil Nadu, India.
Damodaran NarayanaswamyDepartment of Pharmacy, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Potheri, Tamil Nadu, India.
Surya TejaDepartment of Pharmacy, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Potheri, Tamil Nadu, India.
SRM Dental College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSutures which are used for wound approximation can act as a reservoir of microbes at the surgical site leading to increased chances of surgical site infection (SSI). Sutures used in oral cavity are continuously bathed in saliva which results in wicking. Several studies on sutures treated with nanoparticles, antibacterial agent and various drugs to advance the therapeutical value of surgical sutures are in consideration, drug-eluting sutures has been notable in research to deliver localized effect on the site of incision. Ciprofloxacin and Aloe vera are routinely used agents in coating sutures.

aimThis study is to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy and oral biofilm inhibition of Ciprofloxacin and Aloe vera coated 3-0 silk sutures in comparison to uncoated sutures against E.coli. MATERIAL AND

methodsEqual segments of ciprofloxacin and aloe vera coated 3-0 silk sutures are to be incubated in E.coli culture media (blood agar) at 37°C for 24 hours in aerobic atmosphere. Plain uncoated suture served as control. Assessment was done using Total Colony Forming Units and biofilm inhibition potential of sutures. Results awaited.

resultsThe zone of inhibition around ciprofloxacin coated suture is nearly double than that of with Aloe vera indicted that antibacterial efficacy of ciprofloxacin is more comparatively. No inhibition zone around uncoated plain 3-0 braided silk shows that it has no significant antibacterial activity.

conclusionWithin limitation of our study, it can be concluded that both ciprofloxacin and Aloe vera coated sutures have antibacterial property against gram negative E. coli and can have a promising role in prevention of SSI although it would require further in vivo validation.

Indexed as

Aloe veraantibacterial suturesciprofloxacinE. coli

Identifiers

PMID31198330
PMCPMC6555338
OpenAlexW2946868732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.