Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31198260›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia, essays and researches

Effect of Cricoid Pressure on the Glottic View and Intubation with King Vision

M Manjuladevi, Vikram M Shivappagoudar, Shilpa Bhimasen Joshi, Pramod Kalgudi, Santu Ghosh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia, essays and researches. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M ManjuladeviDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, St. John's Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Vikram M ShivappagoudarDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, St. John's Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Shilpa Bhimasen JoshiDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, St. John's Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Pramod KalgudiDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, St. John's Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Santu GhoshDepartment of Biostatistics, St. John's Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
St.John's Medical College Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextTo establish the usefulness of King Vision

aimsThis study aims to compare the role of KVL on glottic visualization, intubation time and associated sympathetic response in routine intubations to those intubations done with cricoid pressure (CP). SETTINGS AND

designRandomized controlled study in a tertiary care hospital. METHODOLOGY: Seventy-six patients intubated with KVL were randomized to two groups - Group C (who did not receive any CP) and Group CP - who received CP. The percentage of glottic opening (POGO), intubation time, subjective assessment, and number of attempts taken to introduce KVL and endotracheal tube (ETT) were noted. The saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration and hemodynamic response (heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and rate pressure product) in the peri-intubation period were also recorded.

resultsThe demographics, airway, and technical characteristics of insertion of KVL and ETT were comparable between the groups (

conclusionAlthough overall intubation time with KVL is prolonged in patients with CP, it provides excellent glottic view, eases intubation, and causes insignificant hemodynamic variation.

Indexed as

Cricoid pressureglottisintubationKing Vision® video laryngoscopelaryngoscopy

Identifiers

PMID31198260
PMCPMC6545940
OpenAlexW2941282170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.