ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2019
An important step forward for the future development of an easy and fast procedure for identifying the most dangerous wine spoilage yeast, Dekkera bruxellensis, in wine environment.
Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbiome and Microbiota Within Wineries: A Review.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- An important step forward for the future development of an easy and fast procedure for identifying the most dangerous wine spoilage yeast, Dekkera bruxellensis, in wine environment.Microbial biotechnology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dekkera bruxellensis is the main reason for spoilage in the wine industry. It renders the products unacceptable leading to large economic losses. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) technique has the potential for allowing its specific detection. Nevertheless, some experimental difficulties can be encountered when FISH technique is applied in the wine environment (e.g. matrix and cells' autofluorescence, fluorophore inadequate selection and probes' low specificity to the target organisms). An easy and fast in-suspension RNA-FISH procedure was applied for the first time for identifying D. bruxellensis in wine. A previously designed RNA-FISH probe to detect D. bruxellensis (26S D. brux.5.1) was used, and the matrix and cells' fluorescence interferences, the influence of three fluorophores in FISH performance and the probe specificity were evaluated. The results revealed that to apply RNA-FISH technique in the wine environment, a red-emitting fluorophore should be used. Good probe performance and specificity were achieved with 25% of formamide. The resulting RNA-FISH protocol was applied in wine samples artificially inoculated with D. bruxellensis. This spoilage microorganism was detected in wine at cell densities lower than those associated with phenolic off-flavours. Thus, the RNA-FISH procedure described in this work represents an advancement to facilitate early detection of the most dangerous wine spoilage yeast and, consequently, to reduce the economic losses caused by this yeast to the wine industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.