ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019
Implementing an Opt-in eConsult Program at Seven Academic Medical Centers: a Qualitative Analysis of Primary Care Provider Experiences.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of an Opt-In eConsult Program on Primary Care Demand for Specialty Visits: Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Implementation Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Trial
- Evaluating the Impact of an eConsult Platform on Specialty Care Access for Medicaid Patients.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2025Article
- Visualization analysis of CBL application in Chinese and international medical education based on big data mining.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- eConsultation for Deprescribing Among Older Adults: Clinician Perspectives on Implementation Barriers and Facilitators.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Physician-to-Physician eConsultations to Ophthalmologists at an Academic Medical Center.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Successful Electronic Consultation Service Initiative in Quebec, Canada With Primary Care Physicians' and Specialists' Experiences on Acceptance and Use of Technological Innovation: Cross-Sectional Exploratory Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Implementation and evaluation of an electronic consult program at a large academic health system.PloS one · 2024Article
- Does virtual consultation between primary and specialised care improve healthcare quality? A scoping review of healthcare quality domains assessment.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- General Practitioner Use of e-Consultation to Consult Hospital Specialists: Interview Study to Obtain Physician's Perceptions About Digital Interprofessional Communication.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Mapping Health Professions Education: Using Complexity Science to Make Sense of Learning Through Electronic Consultations.Medical science educator · 2023Article
- Implementing a general practitioner-to-general physician eConsult service (eConsultant) in Australia.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Use of telemedicine for initial outpatient subspecialist consultative visit: A national survey of general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists.Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Optimizing e-Consultations to Adolescent Medicine Specialists: Qualitative Synthesis of Feedback From User-Centered Design.JMIR human factors · 2021Article
- Association of eConsult Implementation With Access to Specialist Care in a Large Urban Safety-Net System.JAMA health forum · 2021Article
- Parent Perspectives on Family-Centered Pediatric Electronic Consultations: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Comparing Patients' Experiences with Electronic and Traditional Consultation: Results from a Multisite Survey.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
- Electronic Consults for Infectious Diseases in a United States Multisite Academic Health System.Open forum infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Patients Assess an eConsult Model's Acceptability at 5 US Academic Medical Centers.Annals of family medicine · 2020Article
- Asynchronous Remote Communication as a Tool for Care Management in Primary Care: A Rapid Review of the Literature.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectronic consultation (eConsult), which involves primary care provider (PCP)-to-specialist asynchronous consultation, is increasingly used in health care systems to streamline care and to improve patient access. The Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) formed a collaborative to support the implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based, opt-in eConsult program across multiple academic medical centers (AMCs). In this model, PCPs can elect to send either an eConsult or a traditional referral.
objectiveWe sought to understand the PCP experience with eConsult to identify facilitators of and barriers to the successful adoption of the model. DESIGN AND
participantsWe conducted 35 semi-structured interviews and 6 focus groups with a range of primary care providers at 7 AMCs participating in the AAMC collaborative. APPROACH: Interviews were recorded and transcribed or detailed field notes were taken. We used the constant comparative method to identify recurring themes within and across sites, and resolve interpretive discrepancies. KEY
resultsWe identified three major themes related to the eConsult program: (1) eConsult increases the comprehensiveness of primary care and fills PCPs' knowledge gaps through case-based learning. (2) Factors that influence PCPs to order an eConsult rather than a traditional referral include patient preference, case complexity, and need for expert guidance. (3) Implementation challenges included increasing PCPs' awareness of the program, addressing PCPs' concerns about increased workload, recruiting engaged specialist consultants, and ensuring high quality eConsult responses. Implementation success relied on PCP ownership of the consultation process, mitigating unintended consequences, ongoing education about the program, and mechanisms for providing feedback to clinicians.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that an opt-in eConsult program at AMCs has the potential to increase PCP knowledge and enhance the comprehensiveness of primary care. For these benefits to be realized, program implementation requires sustained efforts to overcome barriers to use and establish norms guiding eConsult communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.