Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31197725›Full record

SynthesisTropical animal health and production2019

A systematic review on the distribution of Mycobacterium bovis infection among wildlife in the Americas.

Susan C B Domingos, Herzem R Carioca Júnior, Walter Lilenbaum, Myrna T Santa Rosa, Cynthia D Pereira, Luciana S Medeiros

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tropical animal health and production, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex species-induced infections in dogs: a narrative review of five cases reported in Brazil (1990-2024).Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susan C B DomingosLaboratory of Veterinary Immunology and Microbiology, Unit of Teaching and Research in Veterinary Medicine, Acre Federal University, Industrial District, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil.
Herzem R Carioca JúniorLaboratory of Veterinary Immunology and Microbiology, Unit of Teaching and Research in Veterinary Medicine, Acre Federal University, Industrial District, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil.
Walter LilenbaumLaboratory of Veterinary Bacteriology, Biomedical Institute, Fluminense Federal University, 101 Prof. Hernani Mello Street, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Myrna T Santa RosaLaboratory of Veterinary Immunology and Microbiology, Unit of Teaching and Research in Veterinary Medicine, Acre Federal University, Industrial District, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil.
Cynthia D PereiraLaboratory of Veterinary Immunology and Microbiology, Unit of Teaching and Research in Veterinary Medicine, Acre Federal University, Industrial District, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil.
Luciana S MedeirosLaboratory of Veterinary Immunology and Microbiology, Unit of Teaching and Research in Veterinary Medicine, Acre Federal University, Industrial District, Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil. lusmedeiros@yahoo.com.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occurrence of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife places at risk livestock, public health, and ecosystems that house endangered species. However, data on wild species that may act as possible reservoirs in the Americas are scarce. This systematic review analyses the available data on wildlife in the Americas regarding the infection by M. bovis. We searched articles published in indexed journals using the keywords: "Mycobacterium bovis," "wild," and "animals". After applying the keywords using online databases, during March and August of 2018, we found 12 articles which encompassed 15 species of wild animals, of which three consisted of wild ruminants. The evidence showed that M. bovis is present among the wild animals in the Americas. The methodological limitations for diagnosing M. bovis in wild animals are many, demanding the development of new and more precise tools. Furthermore, new researches are needed to elucidate the role of the wild animals in the epidemiology of M. bovis and its possible impact on production animals and public health.

Indexed as

Animals, WildArtiodactylaCarnivoraDidelphisAmericasAnimalsCattleMycobacterium bovisSouth AmericaTuberculosis, BovineUnited StatesDiagnosticsMycobacterium bovisWild animals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.