Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31197690›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019

Safety and Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma (3-5 cm): a Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.

Qing-Wang Ye, Shu-Jie Pang, Ning Yang, Hai-Bin Zhang, Yong Fu, Bin Lin, Guang-Shun Yang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qing-Wang YeDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Shu-Jie PangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Ning YangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Hai-Bin ZhangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Yong FuDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Bin LinDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Suqian People's Hospital of Nanjing Drum-Tower Hospital Group, Suqian, 223800, China. linbin223800@163.com.
Guang-Shun YangDepartment of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200438, China. yangguangshunlab@sina.com.
Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital · CNNanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNSecond Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (3-5 cm) in comparison with surgical resection.

methodsIncluded in this study were 388 patients with primary and solitary hepatocellular carcinoma, of whom 196 patients underwent surgical resection and the other 192 patients received radiofrequency ablation. Clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, post-treatment complications, hospital stay, and financial expenditures between the two groups were compared retrospectively.

resultsThe result of propensity score matching and subgroup analysis showed that the 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were comparable in patients with tumors of 3-4 cm in diameter between surgical resection and radiofrequency ablation groups. However, when the tumor size exceeded 4 cm in diameter, surgical resection exhibited a superior long-term prognosis compared with radiofrequency ablation. Nevertheless, hepatectomy was associated with high occurrences of postoperative complications, long hospital stay, and high hospitalization cost as compared with radiofrequency ablation. Further analysis of the relationship between tumor size and pathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma showed that tumors larger than 4 cm were positively correlated with a high rate of microvascular invasion and satellite nodule formation.

conclusionFor solitary hepatocellular carcinoma of 3-4 cm in diameter, radiofrequency ablation could achieve a comparable prognosis with a low incidence of post-treatment complications and low hospitalization costs, while surgical resection is recommended for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma tumors of 4-5 cm in diameter when long-term prognosis is considered.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreCarcinoma, HepatocellularCatheter AblationDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatectomyHumansLength of StayLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHepatectomyHepatocellular carcinomaPrognosisRadiofrequency ablation

Identifiers

PMID31197690
OpenAlexW2950238777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.