Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31197627›Full record

ArticleScience and engineering ethics2020

AMICAI: A Method Based on Risk Analysis to Integrate Responsible Research and Innovation into the Work of Research and Innovation Practitioners.

Christopher Brandl, Matthias Wille, Jochen Nelles, Peter Rasche, Katharina Schäfer, Frank O Flemisch, Martin Frenz, Verena Nitsch, Alexander Mertens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science and engineering ethics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher BrandlInstitute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, RWTH Aachen University, Bergdriesch 27, 52062, Aachen, Germany. c.brandl@iaw.rwth-aachen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-6736-7366
Matthias WilleInstitute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, RWTH Aachen University, Bergdriesch 27, 52062, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0703-8944
Jochen NellesInstitute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, RWTH Aachen University, Bergdriesch 27, 52062, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6123-9424
Peter RascheInstitute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, RWTH Aachen University, Bergdriesch 27, 52062, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7974-8668
Katharina SchäferInstitute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, RWTH Aachen University, Bergdriesch 27, 52062, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7376-7304
Frank O FlemischInstitute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, RWTH Aachen University, Bergdriesch 27, 52062, Aachen, Germany.
Martin FrenzInstitute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, RWTH Aachen University, Bergdriesch 27, 52062, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8551-5032
Verena NitschInstitute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, RWTH Aachen University, Bergdriesch 27, 52062, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4784-1283
Alexander MertensInstitute of Industrial Engineering and Ergonomics, RWTH Aachen University, Bergdriesch 27, 52062, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3703-0401

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 02L17C000Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 16ITA206Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 16SV6143Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 16SV7111Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 16SV7190Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 16SV7860European Union 826232Land Nordrhein-Westfalen und Europäischen Fonds für regionale Entwicklung (EFRE) 2014-2020 EFRE-0200459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of ethics into the day-to-day work of research and innovation (R&I) is an important but difficult challenge. However, with the Aachen method for identification, classification and risk analysis of innovation-based problems (AMICAI) an approach from an engineering perspective is presented that enables the integration of ethical, legal and social implications into the day-to-day work of R&I practitioners. AMICAI appears in particular capable of providing a procedural guidance for R&I practitioners based on a method established in engineering science, breaking down the object of consideration into partial aspects and prioritizing the innovation-based problems in dependence of potential risk. This enables the user to apply AMICAI continuously during all stages of the research and development (R&D) process and to analyze and choose between certain sociotechnical alternatives. In this way, problems that affect ethical, legal, and social aspects can be understood, reflected and considered in the mostly technically focused R&D process. The paper gives a general guidance about AMICAI by describing principles and assumptions, providing the steps of analysis and application aids, giving an example application, explaining the necessary adjustments of AMICAI compared to the methodical basis of failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis and discussing the advantages and limits. AMICAI's simple applications can stimulate interdisciplinary cooperation in the R&D process and be a starting point for the development of an "open RRI risk analysis platform" allowing society to evaluate innovation-based problems.

Indexed as

EngineeringMoralsHumansRisk AssessmentELSAELSIRisk analysisRRITechnology assessment

Identifiers

PMID31197627
PMCPMC7089891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.