Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31197489›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2019

Beyond small-scale spatial skills: Navigation skills and geoscience education.

Alina Nazareth, Nora S Newcombe, Thomas F Shipley, Mia Velazquez, Steven M Weisberg

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Role of Field Training in STEM Education: Theoretical and Practical Limitations of Scalability.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alina NazarethTemple University, 1701 N. 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA. alina.nazareth@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1045-6760
Nora S NewcombeTemple University, 1701 N. 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Thomas F ShipleyTemple University, 1701 N. 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Mia VelazquezTemple University, 1701 N. 13th Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Steven M WeisbergCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Temple University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

National Science Foundation 1640800National Science Foundation 1660996National Science Foundation 1734365National Science Foundation SBE -1041707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch examining the relation between spatial skills and the science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields has focused on small-scale spatial skills, even though some STEM disciplines-particularly the geography and geoscience (GEO) fields-involve large-scale spatial thinking at the core of their professional training. In Study 1, we compared large-scale navigation skills of experienced geologists with those of experienced psychologists, using a novel virtual navigation paradigm as an objective measure of navigation skills. In Study 2, we conducted a longitudinal study with novice Geographic Information Systems (GIS) students to investigate baseline navigational competence and improvement over the course of an academic semester.

resultsIn Study 1, we found that geologists demonstrated higher navigational competence and were more likely to be categorized as integrating separate routes, compared to their non-STEM counterparts. In Study 2, novice GIS students showed superior baseline navigational competence compared to non-STEM students, as well as better spatial working memory and small-scale mental rotation skills, indicating self-selection. In addition, GIS students' spatial skills improved more over the course of a semester than those of non-STEM students.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the importance of large-scale spatial thinking for enrollment and success in the GEO fields but likely also across the broader range of thinking involving spatial distributions. We discuss the potential of GIS tools to develop spatial skills at an early age.

Indexed as

Geographic Information SystemsGeologyNavigationSpatial cognitionVirtual environment

Identifiers

PMID31197489
PMCPMC6565794
OpenAlexW2945132410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.