Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31197457›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2019

Suitability of RNALater solution as a tissue-preserving reagent for immunohistochemical analysis.

Anastasia V Suhovskih, Galina M Kazanskaya, Alexander M Volkov, Alexandra Y Tsidulko, Svetlana V Aidagulova, Elvira V Grigorieva

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. In focus in HCB.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anastasia V SuhovskihInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics FRC FTM, Timakova 2/12, Novosibirsk, 630117, Russia.
Galina M KazanskayaInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics FRC FTM, Timakova 2/12, Novosibirsk, 630117, Russia.
Alexander M VolkovE. N. Meshalkin, Siberian Federal Biomedical Research Center, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexandra Y TsidulkoInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics FRC FTM, Timakova 2/12, Novosibirsk, 630117, Russia.
Svetlana V AidagulovaNovosibirsk State Medical University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Elvira V GrigorievaInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics FRC FTM, Timakova 2/12, Novosibirsk, 630117, Russia. elv_grig@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2457-9179
Federal Research Center of Fundamental and Translational Medicine · RUNovosibirsk State University · RUMeshalkin National Medical Research Center · RUNovosibirsk State Medical University · RU

Funding

Council on grants of the President of the Russian Federation SP-5435.2018.4Russian Science Support Foundation 16-15-10243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histological and immunohistochemical studies require high-quality paraffin blocks, where proper fixation of tissue samples with formalin is a key point. However, in some cases, the possibility to preserve biological samples prior to the formalin fixation or to use deposited tissues from biobanks is important. RNA-stabilizing reagent RNALater represents a potential option, but its suitability for pathological and immunohistochemical studies remains underinvestigated. Here, comparative study of formalin-fixed tissues and those had undergone preservation with RNALater was performed for different SCID mice tissues (brain, liver, kidney, and lung) using histological staining (hematoxylin-eosin and Weigert-van Gieson) or immunostaining for b-actin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and glycosaminoglycan chondroitin sulfate. It was shown that RNALater preservation for 7-14 days was suitable for histological characterisation of mouse lung tissue, whereas all other tissues demonstrated some changes. Immunoreactivity of all the studied tissues was affected to a different extent, and the observed changes were detected at the 7th day already and continued to get worse by the 14th day. Overall, RNALater preservation affects immunogenicity of normal mouse tissues (brain, liver, kidney, and lung) making them unsuitable for immunohistochemistry. Some tissues retain their morphology (lung tissue) or demonstrate moderate changes (brain, liver, kidney), suggesting a restricted suitability of the RNALater-preserved tissues for histological analysis.

Indexed as

AnimalsImmunohistochemistryIndicators and ReagentsMiceMice, SCIDRNASolutionsTissue PreservationIndicators and ReagentsRNASolutionsBiobankChondroitin sulfateGlial fibrillary acidic proteinHistologyImmunohistochemistryRNALater tissue preservation

Identifiers

PMID31197457
OpenAlexW2952404205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.