Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31197419›Full record

SynthesisMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2020

["Triage"-primary assessment of patients in the emergency department : An overview with a systematic review].

M Möckel, S Reiter, T Lindner, A Slagman

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Core curriculum of intensive care and emergency medicine in internal medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Medical Emergencies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M MöckelNotfall- und Akutmedizin - Zentrale Notaufnahmen und Chest Pain Units, Campus Virchow-Klinikum und Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. martin.moeckel@charite.de.
S ReiterNotfall- und Akutmedizin - Zentrale Notaufnahmen und Chest Pain Units, Campus Virchow-Klinikum und Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
T LindnerNotfall- und Akutmedizin - Zentrale Notaufnahmen und Chest Pain Units, Campus Virchow-Klinikum und Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
A SlagmanNotfall- und Akutmedizin - Zentrale Notaufnahmen und Chest Pain Units, Campus Virchow-Klinikum und Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background"Triage" means the primary assessment of a previously unknown patient with an acute health disorder, initially considered a medical emergency. The initial triage is part of the primary assessment, which also includes the registration of administrative data and patient's mode of arrival.

objectivesThe aim of the work is to provide an overview of frequently used structured primary assessment tools and the underlying evidence for their use in the emergency room.

methodsBased on a systematic literature search in PubMed, 41 articles were selected according to predefined criteria.

resultsThe most frequently used primary assessment systems in Germany are the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and the Manchester Triage System (MTS). Scientific evidence exists for the accuracy and reliability of the primary assessment with these instruments. However, there are no gold standards for measuring urgency, so that separate criteria must be defined. Sufficient data to determine a treatment sector or the necessary staffing levels are lacking.

conclusionsStructured primary assessment using formalized systems alone is inadequate to categorize the urgency of emergency and acute patients. In fact, a combination of different measures in an interprofessional team is required. Primary assessment systems and processes generally do not allow patients to be referred to downstream structures without a thorough medical examination.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalTriageGermanyHumansReproducibility of ResultsClinical decision makingCrowdingEmergencyHealth care sectorResuscitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.