Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31197373›Full record

ArticleSingapore medical journal2020

Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 among older adults in an Asian country.

Mythily Subramaniam, Edimansyah Abdin, Janhavi A Vaingankar, Vathsala Sagayadevan, Shazana Shahwan, Louisa Picco, Siow Ann Chong

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Singapore medical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07532551 (Assessing the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07532551 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Assessing the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) for Anxiety and Depression in Singapore

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational University of SingaporeRan2026 to 2028Enrolled390ConditionsDepression and/or Anxiety in the Mild-to-moderate Range, Cognitive Behavioral TherapyArmsInternet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The SG90 cohort of the oldest-old in Singapore.European journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Aged care: the evolving landscape of research.Singapore medical journal · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mythily SubramaniamResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Edimansyah AbdinResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Janhavi A VaingankarResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Vathsala SagayadevanResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Shazana ShahwanResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Louisa PiccoResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Siow Ann ChongResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAs populations age globally and the burden of chronic illnesses increases, valid measures of disability are needed for assessment in the older adult population. The aim of the current analysis was to explore the psychometric properties and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in an epidemiological survey of older adults in Singapore.

methodsThe study comprised secondary data analysis of the Well-being of the Singapore Elderly study. Inclusion criteria for the study were Singapore residents (Singapore citizens and permanent residents) aged 60 years and above. The 12-item interviewer-administered version of the WHODAS 2.0 was used to assess disability in the study. Data on cognition, health status and sociodemographic information were collected. Depression was assessed using the Automated Geriatric Examination for Computer Assisted Taxonomy.

resultsThe study found a one-factor model solution for WHODAS 2.0 with a high internal consistency of all items. The internal consistency for the overall scale was 0.92. The WHODAS 2.0 score positively correlated with multimorbidity, perceived overall health status, depression and subsyndromal depression. There was a significant inverse association between the WHODAS 2.0 score and the cognitive status. After adjustment for all sociodemographic variables in the multiple linear regression analysis, these measures remained significantly associated with the WHODAS 2.0 score.

conclusionWHODAS 2.0 was found to be a valid measure of disability among older adults. However, further research is required to determine its usefulness as a responsive instrument that can detect change following interventions.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationAgedAged, 80 and overAsiaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedSingaporeWorld Health Organizationdisabilitymultiethnicolder adultsSingaporeWHODAS 2.0

Identifiers

PMID31197373
PMCPMC7905154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.