Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31197311›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2019

Radiation doses with various body weights of phantoms in brain 128-slice MDCT examination.

Hung-Chih Lin, Te-Jen Lai, Hsien-Chun Tseng, Ching-Hsiang Wang, Yen-Ling Tseng, Chien-Yi Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluating photoneutron dose equivalents for lung cancer using PMMA phantoms undergoing 15 MV IMRT.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2022
    Article
  3. Evaluating dose distributions of normal organs for patients undergoing VMAT therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma using Rando phantom and TLD-100H.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hung-Chih LinInstitute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Te-Jen LaiInstitute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Hsien-Chun TsengSchool of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Ching-Hsiang WangDepartment of Radiology, Lukang Christian Hospital of Changhua Christian, Medical Foundation, Lukang, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Yen-Ling TsengDepartment of Radiology, Lukang Christian Hospital of Changhua Christian, Medical Foundation, Lukang, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Chien-Yi ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China.
Changhua Christian Hospital · TWChung Shan Medical University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effective dose (HE) and organ or tissue equivalent dose (HT) for use in brain computed tomography (CT) examinations with various body weights were evaluated. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100H) were inserted into Rando and five anthropomorphic phantoms. These phantoms were made of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), according to the specifications of ICRU 48, with masses from 10 to 90 kg. Brain CT examinations were conducted, scanning the maxillae from the external auditory meatus to the parietal bone using a 128-slice multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanner. To reduce errors, three independent trials were conducted. Calculated HE,TLD, based on the weighting factor recommended by ICRP 103, was 1.72 ± 0.28 mSv, which slightly exceeds the HE,DLP of 1.70 mSv, that was calculated from the dose-length product (DLP) of the Rando phantom. This experiment yielded HE,TLD values of ICRP 103 from the highest 1.85 ± 0.28 (90 kg) to the lowest 1.47 ± 0.22 (10 kg) mSv. HE,TLD (mSv) = 5.45×10-3 W(kg) + 1.361, with an R2 of 0.87667. Using the DLP protocol, HE,DLP was estimated from CTDIvol that was recorded directly from the console display of the CT unit and multiplied by the conversion coefficient (k) recommended by the ICRP 103. Finally, the experimental results obtained herein are compared with those in the literature. Physicians should choose and adjust protocols to prevent the exposure of patients to unnecessary radiation, satisfying the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle. These findings will be valuable to patients, physicians, radiologists and the public.

Indexed as

Body WeightPhantoms, ImagingAlgorithmsAnthropometryBrainCalibrationFemaleHumansMaleRadiation DosageThermoluminescent DosimetryTomography, X-Ray Computedcomputed tomographyeffective doseICRP 103Rando phantomthermoluminescent dosimeters

Identifiers

PMID31197311
PMCPMC6640898
OpenAlexW2949959760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.