Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31196934›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2019

The Ventral Visual Pathway Represents Animal Appearance over Animacy, Unlike Human Behavior and Deep Neural Networks.

Stefania Bracci, J Brendan Ritchie, Ioannis Kalfas, Hans P Op de Beeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Scope and Limits of Fine-Grained Image and Category Information in the Ventral Visual Pathway.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Category Trumps Shape as an Organizational Principle of Object Space in the Human Occipitotemporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Deep Neural Networks and Visuo-Semantic Models Explain Complementary Components of Human Ventral-Stream Representational Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  15. Pulvinar Response Profiles and Connectivity Patterns to Object Domains.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Face neurons encode nonsemantic features.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefania BracciLaboratory of Biological Psychology, and stefania.bracci@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0003-1435-2536
J Brendan RitchieLaboratory of Biological Psychology, and.ORCID 0000-0002-2402-8724
Ioannis KalfasLaboratory of Neurophysiology and Psychophysiology, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
Hans P Op de BeeckLaboratory of Biological Psychology, and.ORCID 0000-0002-2250-212X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies showed agreement between how the human brain and neural networks represent objects, suggesting that we might start to understand the underlying computations. However, we know that the human brain is prone to biases at many perceptual and cognitive levels, often shaped by learning history and evolutionary constraints. Here, we explore one such perceptual phenomenon, perceiving animacy, and use the performance of neural networks as a benchmark. We performed an fMRI study that dissociated object appearance (what an object looks like) from object category (animate or inanimate) by constructing a stimulus set that includes animate objects (e.g., a cow), typical inanimate objects (e.g., a mug), and, crucially, inanimate objects that look like the animate objects (e.g., a cow mug). Behavioral judgments and deep neural networks categorized images mainly by animacy, setting all objects (lookalike and inanimate) apart from the animate ones. In contrast, activity patterns in ventral occipitotemporal cortex (VTC) were better explained by object appearance: animals and lookalikes were similarly represented and separated from the inanimate objects. Furthermore, the appearance of an object interfered with proper object identification, such as failing to signal that a cow mug is a mug. The preference in VTC to represent a lookalike as animate was even present when participants performed a task requiring them to report the lookalikes as inanimate. In conclusion, VTC representations, in contrast to neural networks, fail to represent objects when visual appearance is dissociated from animacy, probably due to a preferred processing of visual features typical of animate objects.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePattern Recognition, VisualVisual CortexVisual Pathwaysanimacydeep neural networksfMRIMVPAobject representationsoccipitotemporal cortex

Identifiers

PMID31196934
PMCPMC6697402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.