Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31196863›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2019

Subject-Specific Studies of CSF Bulk Flow Patterns in the Spinal Canal: Implications for the Dispersion of Solute Particles in Intrathecal Drug Delivery.

W Coenen, C Gutiérrez-Montes, S Sincomb, E Criado-Hidalgo, K Wei, K King, V Haughton, C Martínez-Bazán, A L Sánchez, J C Lasheras

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Physics of fluids (Woodbury, N.Y. : 1994) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow.Annual review of fluid mechanics · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

W CoenenFrom the Departments of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (W.C., S.S., E.C.-H., A.L.S., J.C.L.) wicoenen@ucsd.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2693-6574
C Gutiérrez-MontesDepartment of Mechanical and Mining Engineering (C.G.-M., C.M.-B.), University of Jaén, Jaén, Andalucía, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1123-2002
S SincombFrom the Departments of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (W.C., S.S., E.C.-H., A.L.S., J.C.L.).ORCID 0000-0003-1782-0825
E Criado-HidalgoFrom the Departments of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (W.C., S.S., E.C.-H., A.L.S., J.C.L.).ORCID 0000-0001-9086-9129
K WeiMRI Center (K.W., K.K.), Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7693-473X
K KingMRI Center (K.W., K.K.), Huntington Medical Research Institutes, Pasadena, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4449-2468
V HaughtonDepartment of Radiology (V.H.), School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0001-5618-4628
C Martínez-BazánDepartment of Mechanical and Mining Engineering (C.G.-M., C.M.-B.), University of Jaén, Jaén, Andalucía, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2023-4691
A L SánchezFrom the Departments of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (W.C., S.S., E.C.-H., A.L.S., J.C.L.).ORCID 0000-0003-1349-9843
J C LasherasFrom the Departments of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (W.C., S.S., E.C.-H., A.L.S., J.C.L.).ORCID 0000-0001-5273-555X
S.P.E.C.I.E.S. · USHuntington Medical Research Institutes · USUniversidad de Jaén · ESUniversity of San Diego · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRecent flow dynamics studies have shown that the eccentricity of the spinal cord affects the magnitude and characteristics of the slow bulk motion of CSF in the spinal subarachnoid space, which is an important variable in solute transport along the spinal canal. The goal of this study was to investigate how anatomic differences among subjects affect this bulk flow. MATERIALS AND

methodsT2-weighted spinal images were obtained in 4 subjects and repeated in 1 subject after repositioning. CSF velocity was calculated from phase-contrast MR images for 7 equally spaced levels along the length of the spine. This information was input into a 2-time-scale asymptotic analysis of the Navier-Stokes and concentration equations to calculate the short- and long-term CSF flow in the spinal subarachnoid space. Bulk flow streamlines were shown for each subject and position and inspected for differences in patterns.

resultsThe 4 subjects had variable degrees of lordosis and kyphosis. Repositioning in 1 subject changed the degree of cervical lordosis and thoracic kyphosis. The streamlines of bulk flow show the existence of distinct regions where the fluid particles flow in circular patterns. The location and interconnectivity of these recirculating regions varied among individuals and different positions.

conclusionsLordosis, kyphosis, and spinal cord eccentricity in the healthy human spine result in subject-specific patterns of bulk flow recirculating regions. The extent of the interconnectivity of the streamlines among these recirculating regions is fundamental in determining the long-term transport of solute particles along the spinal canal.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdultCerebrospinal FluidFemaleHumansHydrodynamicsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSpinal CanalSubarachnoid SpaceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31196863
PMCPMC7048533
OpenAlexW2951535467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.