ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2019
[Performance of Deep-learning-based Artificial Intelligence on Detection of Pulmonary Nodules in Chest CT].
Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence models for pulmonary nodule classification: a multi-model evaluation.European radiology · 2026Article
- A Thorough Review of the Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-based graded training of pulmonary nodules for junior radiology residents and medical imaging students.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Application value of a computer-aided diagnosis and management system for the detection of lung nodules.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Performance of Deep-Learning Solutions on Lung Nodule Malignancy Classification: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Cuproptosis-related gene identification and immune infiltration analysis in systemic lupus erythematosus.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Pulmonary Nodule Clinical Trial Data Collection and Intelligent Differential Diagnosis for Medical Internet of Things.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Article
- Design Computer-Aided Diagnosis System Based on Chest CT Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Progress of Artificial Intelligence in Gynecological Malignant Tumors.Cancer management and research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe detection of pulmonary nodules is a key step to achieving the early diagnosis and therapy of lung cancer. Deep learning based Artificial intelligence (AI) presents as the state of the art in the area of nodule detection, however, a validation with clinical data is necessary for further application. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of AI in the detection of malignant and non-calcified nodules in chest CT.
methodsTwo hundred chest computed tomography (CT) data were randomly selected from a self-built nodule database from Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. Both the pathology confirmed lung cancers and the nodules in the process of follow-up were included. All CTs were processed by AI and the results were compared with that of radiologists retrieved from the original medical reports. The ground truths were further determined by two experienced radiologists. The size and characteristics of the nodules were evaluated as well. The sensitivity and false positive rate were used to evaluate the effectiveness of AI and radiologists in detecting nodules. The McNemar test was used to determine whether there was a significant difference.
resultsA total of 889 non-calcified nodules were determined by experts on chest CT, including 133 lung cancers. Of them, 442 nodules were less than 5 mm. The cancer detection rates of AI and radiologists are 100%. The sensitivity of AI on nodule detection was significantly higher than that of radiologists (99.1% vs 43%, P<0.001). The false-positive rate of AI was 4.9 per CT and decreased to 1.5 when nodules less than 5 mm were excluded.
conclusionsAI achieves the detection of all malignancies and improve the sensitivity of pulmonary nodules detection beyond radiologists, with a low false positive rate after excluding small nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.