Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31196366›Full record

ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2019

[Performance of Deep-learning-based Artificial Intelligence on Detection of Pulmonary Nodules in Chest CT].

Xinling Li, Fangfang Guo, Zhen Zhou, Fandong Zhang, Qin Wang, Zhijun Peng, Datong Su, Yaguang Fan, Ying Wang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinling LiDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Fangfang GuoDepartment of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of XinXiang Medical College, Xinxiang 453100, China.
Zhen ZhouDeepwise Healthcare, Beijing 100080, China.
Fandong ZhangDeepwise Healthcare, Beijing 100080, China.
Qin WangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Zhijun PengDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Datong SuDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Yaguang FanTianjin Key Laboratory of Lung Cancer Metastasis and Tumor Microenvironment, Tianjin Lung Cancer Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Ying WangDepartment of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China.
Tianjin Medical University General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe detection of pulmonary nodules is a key step to achieving the early diagnosis and therapy of lung cancer. Deep learning based Artificial intelligence (AI) presents as the state of the art in the area of nodule detection, however, a validation with clinical data is necessary for further application. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of AI in the detection of malignant and non-calcified nodules in chest CT.

methodsTwo hundred chest computed tomography (CT) data were randomly selected from a self-built nodule database from Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. Both the pathology confirmed lung cancers and the nodules in the process of follow-up were included. All CTs were processed by AI and the results were compared with that of radiologists retrieved from the original medical reports. The ground truths were further determined by two experienced radiologists. The size and characteristics of the nodules were evaluated as well. The sensitivity and false positive rate were used to evaluate the effectiveness of AI and radiologists in detecting nodules. The McNemar test was used to determine whether there was a significant difference.

resultsA total of 889 non-calcified nodules were determined by experts on chest CT, including 133 lung cancers. Of them, 442 nodules were less than 5 mm. The cancer detection rates of AI and radiologists are 100%. The sensitivity of AI on nodule detection was significantly higher than that of radiologists (99.1% vs 43%, P<0.001). The false-positive rate of AI was 4.9 per CT and decreased to 1.5 when nodules less than 5 mm were excluded.

conclusionsAI achieves the detection of all malignancies and improve the sensitivity of pulmonary nodules detection beyond radiologists, with a low false positive rate after excluding small nodules.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDeep LearningHumansLung NeoplasmsMultiple Pulmonary NodulesTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceComputed tomographyDeep learningDetectionLung nodules

Identifiers

PMID31196366
PMCPMC6580084
OpenAlexW2991479546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.