ArticleBMC medical genomics2019
Prenatal identification of partial 3q duplication syndrome.
Article in BMC medical genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- New insights on partial trisomy 3q syndrome: de novo 3q27.1-q29 duplication in a newborn with pre and postnatal overgrowth and assisted reproductive conception.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Inherited unbalanced reciprocal translocation with 3q duplication and 5p deletion in a foetus revealed by cell-free foetal DNA (cffDNA) testing: a case report.European journal of medical research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 3q duplication syndrome is a result of duplication of a large fragment of the long arm of chromosome 3, mainly 3q21-qter, and in most cases it is diagnosed only after birth. The phenotypic consequences resulting from genetic imbalance are an important source of information for genetic counselling, especially in prenatal diagnostics. However, in most cases it is impossible to define them precisely because the final clinical presentation is a result of an overlap, usually due to different sizes of deletions and/or duplications not only chromosome 3 but also of translocation partner chromosome. In this article, we present a prenatal diagnosis of the 3q duplication syndrome in a foetus, arising from a balanced insertion ins (7,3)(q21.2;q12.3q29) carried by the mother. CASE PRESENTATION: The article presents a case of a 29-year-old woman referred to the Genetic Outpatient Clinic for consultation in the 12th week of her fifth pregnancy with a diagnosis of generalised hydrops foetalis. The analysis of karyotype using GTG technique and FISH allowed diagnosis of a balanced aberration in the mother, and determined the type of chromosomal rearrangement, which allowed the identification of the origin of the additional genetic material in the foetus and the previous malformed child of the same couple. The use of molecular karyotyping techniques (FISH and aCGH) allowed a precise determination of the size of the imbalanced fragments in the affected siblings.
conclusionsThe aCGH technique is particularly valuable for the diagnostics of submicroscopic deletions and duplications, if no imbalanced chromosomal aberrations are detected by routine cytogenetic tests. It is also a valuable technique for identifying and fully characterizing genetic material of unknown origin, which can't be identified using routine cytogenetic techniqes. However, it does not allow identification of balanced aberrations in carriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.