Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31196189›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Knowledge, attitude and practice among non-ophthalmic health care providers regarding eye management of diabetics in private sector of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Talal Bassam Abu-Amara, Waleed Abdulaziz Al Rashed, Rajiv Khandekar, Hamad Mohammed Qabha, Faris Mohammad Alosaimi, Abdulrahman Abdullah Alshuwayrikh, Mansour Khalid Almadi, Alanoud Alfaris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Talal Bassam Abu-AmaraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Imam Mohammad Bin Saud Islamic University, collage of medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. talalabuamara@gmail.com.
Waleed Abdulaziz Al RashedDepartment of Ophthalmology, Imam Mohammad Bin Saud Islamic University, collage of medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rajiv KhandekarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Imam Mohammad Bin Saud Islamic University, collage of medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hamad Mohammed QabhaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Imam Mohammad Bin Saud Islamic University, collage of medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Faris Mohammad AlosaimiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Imam Mohammad Bin Saud Islamic University, collage of medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman Abdullah AlshuwayrikhDepartment of Ophthalmology, Imam Mohammad Bin Saud Islamic University, collage of medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mansour Khalid AlmadiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Imam Mohammad Bin Saud Islamic University, collage of medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Alanoud AlfarisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Imam Mohammad Bin Saud Islamic University, collage of medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe levels of knowledge, attitude and practice among primary physicians concerning both diabetic retinopathy screening and treatment of sight threatening diabetic retinopathy have been studied by different groups, such as medical students, pharmacists, Primary Health Care staff and opticians. In some studies, the levels were very high, while in others it was noted to be less than desired.

aimThis study's intent is to estimate and improve level of Knowledge (K), Attitude (A) and Practice (P) among non-ophthalmic health care providers regarding eye management of diabetes and barriers that people with diabetes face in Saudi Arabia.

methodsThis cross-sectional survey targeted medical doctors (except ophthalmologists) working at private sector institutions in Riyadh. They were interviewed using closed-ended questions for knowledge (8), attitude (5), practice (5), and reasons for their current KAP status comprised of 8 questions. The level of Knowledge was assessed as good if its score was (> 50%); positive attitude (> 50%) and excellent practice (> 75%) were estimated and associated to the risk factors.

resultsOut of the 355 participants that were interviewed, the percentages of good knowledge, positive attitude and excellent practice concerning diabetic retinopathy (DR)were 193 [54.3% (95% CI 49.2-59.5)], 111 [31.3% (95% CI 26.4-36.1)], and 145 [40.8% (95% CI 35.7-46.0) participants, respectively. Gender, place of work and type of doctor were not significantly associated with the level of KAP. Salient reasons for low KAP status included a busy schedule (54.6%), less resources (75.2%), inadequate periodic training in eye care (69%), and absence of retinal evaluation training (49.6%).

conclusionsImproving KAP level is urgently needed. Addressing underlying causes of low KAP could enhance eye care of people with diabetes. Additionally, training for primary health care providers for early detection of DR and timely management of sight threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) is necessary.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningPrivate SectorCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusDiabetic RetinopathyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansReferral and ConsultationSaudi ArabiaDiabetesDiabetic retinopathyKAPPrimary health care providersScreening

Identifiers

PMID31196189
PMCPMC6567513
OpenAlexW2953312134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.