Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31196175›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2019

Perspectives of women participating in a cervical cancer screening campaign with community-based HPV self-sampling in rural western Kenya: a qualitative study.

Sandra Y Oketch, Zachary Kwena, Yujung Choi, Konyin Adewumi, Michelle Moghadassi, Elizabeth A Bukusi, Megan J Huchko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Acceptability of Self-Sampling for Cervical Screening in Ethnically Diverse Groups in Northwest England: A Focus Group Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra Y OketchCenter for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, P. O. Box 54840 00200, Mbagathi Road, Nairobi, Kenya. sandyvone68@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7328-0301
Zachary KwenaCenter for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, P. O. Box 54840 00200, Mbagathi Road, Nairobi, Kenya.
Yujung ChoiDuke Global Health Institute, Box 90519, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Konyin AdewumiDuke Global Health Institute, Box 90519, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Michelle MoghadassiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 3749, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
Elizabeth A BukusiCenter for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, P. O. Box 54840 00200, Mbagathi Road, Nairobi, Kenya.
Megan J HuchkoDuke Global Health Institute, Box 90519, 310 Trent Drive, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Duke Institute for Health Innovation · USKenya Medical Research Institute · KEDuke University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Nairobi · KE

Funding

Evaluating a community-driven cervical cancer prevention model in western KenyaR01CA188428 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HUCHKO, MEGAN J. · 2014 to 2018
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite cervical cancer being preventable with effective screening programs, it is the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death among women in many countries in Africa. Screening involving pelvic examination may not be feasible or acceptable in limited-resource settings. We sought to evaluate women's perspectives on human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling as part of a larger trial on cervical cancer prevention implementation strategies in rural western Kenya.

methodsWe invited 120 women participating in a cluster randomized trial of cervical cancer screening implementation strategies in Migori County, Kenya for in-depth interviews. We explored reasons for testing, experience with and ability to complete HPV self-sampling, importance of clinician involvement during screening, factors and people contributing to screening decision-making, and ways to encourage other women to come for screening. We used validated theoretical frameworks to analyze the qualitative data.

resultsWomen reported having positive experiences with the HPV self-sampling strategy. The factors facilitating uptake included knowledge and beliefs such as prior awareness of HPV, personal perception of cervical cancer risk, desire for improved health outcomes, and peer and partner encouragement. Logistical and screening facilitators included confidence in the ability to complete HPV self-sampling strategy, proximity to screening sites and feelings of privacy and comfort conducting the HPV self- sampling. The barriers to screening included fear of need for a pelvic exam, fear of disease and death associated with cervical cancer. We classified these findings as capabilities, opportunities and motivations for health behavior using the COM-B framework.

conclusionsOverall, HPV self-sampling was an acceptable cervical cancer screening strategy that seemed to meet the needs of the women in this community. These findings will further inform aspects of implementation, including outreach messaging, health education, screening sites and emphasis on availability and effectiveness of preventative treatment for women who screen positive.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdultEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansKenyaMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative ResearchSelf EfficacyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCervical cancer screeningCOM-BHPV self-samplingLMICTheoretical domains framework

Identifiers

PMID31196175
PMCPMC6567898
OpenAlexW2951788009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.