Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31196123›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2019

What is the impact of large-scale implementation of stroke Early Supported Discharge? A mixed methods realist evaluation study protocol.

Rebecca Fisher, Niki Chouliara, Adrian Byrne, Sarah Lewis, Peter Langhorne, Thompson Robinson, Justin Waring, Claudia Geue, Alex Hoffman, Lizz Paley and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rebecca FisherUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. rebecca.fisher@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6866-6341
Niki ChouliaraUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Adrian ByrneUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sarah LewisUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Peter LanghorneUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Thompson RobinsonUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Justin WaringUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Claudia GeueUniversity of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Alex HoffmanKing's College London, London, UK.
Lizz PaleyKing's College London, London, UK.
Anthony RuddKing's College London, London, UK.
Marion WalkerUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 160117Department of Health HS&DR/16/01/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke Early Supported Discharge (ESD) is a service innovation that facilitates discharge from hospital and delivery of specialist rehabilitation in patients' homes. There is currently widespread implementation of ESD services in many countries, driven by robust clinical trial evidence. In England, the type of ESD service patients receive on the ground is variable, and in some regions, ESD is still not offered at all. This protocol presents a study designed to investigate the mechanisms and outcomes of implementing ESD at scale in real-world conditions. This will help to establish which models of ESD are most effective and in what context.

methodsA realist evaluation approach composed of two interlinking work packages will be adopted to investigate how and why ESD works, for whom and in what circumstances. Work package 1 (WP1) will begin with a rapid evidence synthesis to formulate preliminary realist hypotheses. Quantitative analyses of historical prospective Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) data will be performed to evaluate service outcomes based on the degree to which evidence-based ESD has been implemented. Work package 2 (WP2) will involve the qualitative investigation of purposively selected case study sites featuring in WP1 and covering different regions in England. The perspectives of clinicians, managers, commissioners, and service users will be explored qualitatively. Cost implications of ESD models will be examined using a cost-consequence analysis. Cross-case comparisons and triangulation of the data sources from both work packages will be performed to test, revise, and refine initial programme theories and address research aims. DISCUSSION: This study will investigate whether and how current large-scale implementation of ESD is achieving the outcomes suggested by the evidence base. The theory-driven evaluation approach will highlight key mechanisms and contextual conditions necessary to optimise outcomes and allow us to draw transferable lessons to inform the effective implementation and sustainability of ESD in clinical practice. In addition, the methodological framework will progress the theoretical understanding of implementation and evaluation of complex rehabilitation interventions in stroke care.

trial registrationISRCTN: 15568163, registration date: 26 October 2018.

Indexed as

Health Plan ImplementationEnglandHome Care Services, Hospital-BasedHumansOrganizational InnovationPatient DischargeProgram EvaluationResearch DesignStroke RehabilitationCommunity-based rehabilitationEarly Supported DischargeImplementationMixed methodsRealist evaluationStroke

Identifiers

PMID31196123
PMCPMC6567399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.