Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31196120›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2019

Comparison of treatment plans between IMRT with MR-linac and VMAT for lung SABR.

Jong Min Park, Hong-Gyun Wu, Hak Jae Kim, Chang Heon Choi, Jung-In Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Non-Oncological Radiotherapy: A Review of Modern Approaches.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recognising the challenges of implementing multi-centre adaptive plan of the day radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy.Advances in oncology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jong Min ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hong-Gyun WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hak Jae KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Chang Heon ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. dm140@naver.com.
Jung-In KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. madangin@gmail.com.
Seoul National University Hospital · KRAdvanced Institute of Convergence Technology · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2017M2A2A7A02020640National Research Foundation of Korea 2017M2A2A7A02020641National Research Foundation of Korea 2017M2A2A7A02020643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the plan quality of magnetic-resonance image-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (MRI-based-IMRT) with the MRIdian Linac system to that of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with the TrueBeam STx system for lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

methodsA total of 22 patients with tumors located in the lower lobe were retrospectively selected for the study. For each patient, both the MRI-based-IMRT and VMAT plans were generated using an identical CT image set and identical structures with the exception of the planning target volume (PTV). The PTVs of the MRI-based-IMRT were generated by adding an isotropic margin of 3 mm from the gross tumor volume, whereas those of VMAT were generated by adding an isotropic margin of 5 mm from the internal target volume. For both the MRI-based-IMRT and VMAT, the prescription doses to the PTVs were 60 Gy in four fractions.

resultsThe average PTV volume of the MRI-based-IMRT was approximately 4-times smaller than that of VMAT (p <  0.001). The maximum dose to the bronchi for the MRI-based-IMRT was smaller than that for the VMAT (20.4 Gy versus 24.2 Gy, p <  0.001). In addition, V

conclusionsThe MRI-based-IMRT using the MRIdian Linac system could reduce doses to bronchi, rib, ipsilateral lung, and whole body compared to VMAT for lung SABR when the tumor was located in the lower lobe.

Indexed as

HumansLung NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingOrgans at RiskPrognosisRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesMR-IGRTMR-linacPlanning studySABRVMAT

Identifiers

PMID31196120
PMCPMC6567463
OpenAlexW2950895943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.