Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31196084›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2019

Supervision and autonomy of ophthalmology residents in the outpatient clinic in the United States II: a survey of senior residents.

Eric L Singman, Michael V Boland, Jing Tian, Laura K Green, Divya Srikumaran, Writing Committee of the Ophthalmology Program Directors’ Study Group (OPDSG)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eric L SingmanGeneral Eye Services, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins School Of Medicine, Wilmer B-29, 600 N. Wolfe St., Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. esingma1@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0327-4675
Michael V BolandGeneral Eye Services, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins School Of Medicine, Wilmer B-29, 600 N. Wolfe St., Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Jing TianBloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Laura K GreenLifebridge Health Krieger Eye Institute, Baltimore, USA.
Divya SrikumaranGeneral Eye Services, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins School Of Medicine, Wilmer B-29, 600 N. Wolfe St., Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Writing Committee of the Ophthalmology Program Directors’ Study Group (OPDSG)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA balance between autonomy and supervision can be difficult to obtain in medical education. In this study, we sought to determine whether the presence and level of supervision of ophthalmology resident outpatient clinic correlates with metrics of resident success, professionalism and stress.

methodsA survey was emailed to all US ophthalmology program directors requesting it be forwarded to PGY4 residents. Questions included whether their program provided a resident-hosted outpatient clinic, and if so, whether residents were mandated to discuss every patient with faculty. Residents were assigned to three categories based on this question (0: no clinic, 1: mandated faculty input, 2: discretionary faculty input). Success metrics included numbers of manuscripts submitted, OKAP scores and success in obtaining fellowships. Professionalism metrics included rating comfort obtaining informed consent, breaking bad news, managing time in clinic, and confidence in providing care in various settings. Residents affirming participation in a continuity clinic also provided perceptions of the level of supervision and how the clinic affected stress.

resultsCategory 1 residents perceived somewhat too much supervision, while category 2 residents felt that they had somewhat insufficient supervision. The majority of residents in either category did not feel that the continuity clinic affected their overall stress, although those who reported a change in stress usually indicated that the presence of the clinic increased stress. There were no other statistically significant differences between the responses from any category.

conclusionsThe presence of a resident-hosted continuity clinic neither adds nor detracts from the success or sense of professionalism of ophthalmology residents. However, when such a clinic is present, the degree of supervision appears to correlate inversely with resident perception of autonomy. These results suggest that the decision of a training program to offer a clinic hosted by residents offering comprehensive continuity care can be informed primarily by faculty and trainee philosophy and personal preferences without comprising education quality, clinical efficiency, residents' perception of stress or their success in fellowship matching.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesProfessional AutonomyHumansInternship and ResidencyOphthalmologySurveys and QuestionnairesAutonomyBurnoutClinicEducationOphthalmologyOutpatientProfessionalismResidentStressSupervision

Identifiers

PMID31196084
PMCPMC6567568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.