Observational studyBMC public health2019
Workplace bullying and psychological distress of employees across socioeconomic strata: a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Workplace Bullying and Depression Among the Saudi Working Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Personality Traits and Workplace Bullying Victims in Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2024Article
- Gender Differences in the Association between Workplace Bullying and Depression among Korean Employees.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Association of Workplace Bullying with Suicide Ideation and Attempt Among Chinese Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2023Article
- Exposure to Bullying or Hazing During Deployment and Mental Health Outcomes Among US Army Soldiers.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Occupational Disease and Injury in Malaysia: A Thematic Review of Literature from 2016 to 2021.Journal of environmental and public health · 2023Review
- Victimisation, Depression and Suicidal Ideation among Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Adults in Malaysia.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2022Article
- Financial worry and psychological distress among cancer survivors in the United States, 2013-2018.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- The impacts of organizational culture and neoliberal ideology on the continued existence of incivility and bullying in healthcare institutions: A discussion paper.International journal of nursing sciences · 2021Article
- Prevalence of Workplace Bullying and Risk Groups in Chinese Employees in Hong Kong.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Prevalence of Insufficient Sleep and Its Associated Factors Among Working Adults in Malaysia.Nature and science of sleep · 2021Article
- Prevalence of Workplace Bullying and Its Associated Factors among Workers in a Malaysian Public University Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
- Health, access and nutritional issues among low-income population in Malaysia: introductory note.BMC public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background1Little is known of the extent of workplace bullying in Malaysia, despite its growing recognition worldwide as a serious public health issue in the workplace. Workplace bullying is linked to stress-related health issues, as well as socioeconomic consequences which may include absenteeism due to sick days and unemployment. We sought to examine the prevalence of workplace bullying and its association with socioeconomic factors and psychological distress in a large observational study of Malaysian employees.
methodsThis study employed cross-sectional, self-reported survey methodology. We used the 6-item Kessler screening scale (K6) to assess psychological distress (cutoff score ≥ 13, range 0-24, with higher scores indicating greater psychological distress). Participants self-reported their perceptions of whether they had been bullied at work and how frequently this occurred. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted with ever bullying and never bullying as dichotomous categories.
resultsThere were a total of 5235 participants (62.3% female). Participant ages ranged from 18 to 85, mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD): 33.88 ± 8.83. A total of 2045 (39.1%) participants reported ever being bullied. Of these, 731 (14.0%) reported being subject to at least occasional bullying, while another 194 (3.7%) reported it as a common occurrence. Across all income strata, mean scores for psychological distress were significantly higher for ever bullied employees (M ± SD: 8.69 ± 4.83) compared to those never bullied (M ± SD: 5.75 ± 4.49). Regression analysis indicated significant associations (p < 0.001) between workplace bullying with being female (Adjusted OR (aOR) = 1.27, 95% CI 1.12-1.44), higher individual income levels of between RM4,000 to RM7,999 (aOR =1.24, 95% CI 1.06-1.45) and RM8,000 and above (aOR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.56), and psychological distress (aOR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.16).
conclusionsMore than one in three employees reported having experienced workplace bullying, which was found to be specifically associated with being female, drawing a higher income, and greater psychological distress. In general, low individual income was associated with greater psychological distress. However, higher income employees were far more likely to report experiencing workplace bullying. Findings from this study offer relevant insight into the associations between socioeconomic status and psychological distress in workplace bullying.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.