Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31196002›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

A dropout-regularized classifier development approach optimized for precision medicine test discovery from omics data.

Joanna Roder, Carlos Oliveira, Lelia Net, Maxim Tsypin, Benjamin Linstid, Heinrich Roder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Explaining multivariate molecular diagnostic tests via Shapley values.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Robust Distance Measures forCancer informatics · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joanna RoderBiodesix Inc, 2970 Wilderness Pl, Ste100, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA. joanna.roder@biodesix.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7275-8473
Carlos OliveiraBiodesix Inc, 2970 Wilderness Pl, Ste100, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Lelia NetBiodesix Inc, 2970 Wilderness Pl, Ste100, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Maxim TsypinBiodesix Inc, 2970 Wilderness Pl, Ste100, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Benjamin LinstidBiodesix Inc, 2970 Wilderness Pl, Ste100, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.
Heinrich RoderBiodesix Inc, 2970 Wilderness Pl, Ste100, Boulder, CO, 80301, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModern genomic and proteomic profiling methods produce large amounts of data from tissue and blood-based samples that are of potential utility for improving patient care. However, the design of precision medicine tests for unmet clinical needs from this information in the small cohorts available for test discovery remains a challenging task. Obtaining reliable performance assessments at the earliest stages of test development can also be problematic. We describe a novel approach to classifier development designed to create clinically useful tests together with reliable estimates of their performance. The method incorporates elements of traditional and modern machine learning to facilitate the use of cohorts where the number of samples is less than the number of measured patient attributes. It is based on a hierarchy of classification and information abstraction and combines boosting, bagging, and strong dropout regularization.

resultsWe apply this dropout-regularized combination approach to two clinical problems in oncology using mRNA expression and associated clinical data and compare performance with other methods of classifier generation, including Random Forest. Performance of the new method is similar to or better than the Random Forest in the two classification tasks used for comparison. The dropout-regularized combination method also generates an effective classifier in a classification task with a known confounding variable. Most importantly, it provides a reliable estimate of test performance from a relatively small development set of samples.

conclusionsThe flexible dropout-regularized combination approach is able to produce tests tailored to particular clinical questions and mitigate known confounding effects. It allows the design of molecular diagnostic tests addressing particular clinical questions together with reliable assessment of whether test performance is likely to be fit-for-purpose in independent validation at the earliest stages of development.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPrecision MedicineArea Under CurveCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDatabases, GeneticGenomicsHumansLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningMaleProstatic NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisBoostingEnsemble averageMachine LearningMolecular diagnosticsRegularization

Identifiers

PMID31196002
PMCPMC6567499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.