ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
A dropout-regularized classifier development approach optimized for precision medicine test discovery from omics data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a serum proteomic test for predicting patient outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab or docetaxel.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Revealing the diagnostic value and immune infiltration of senescence-related genes in endometriosis: a combined single-cell and machine learning analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Semi-Quantitative MALDI Measurements of Blood-Based Samples for Molecular Diagnostics.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Predicting prognosis in COVID-19 patients using machine learning and readily available clinical data.International journal of medical informatics · 2021Article
- Explaining multivariate molecular diagnostic tests via Shapley values.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a High-Risk Population by a Mass Spectrometry-Based Test.Cancers · 2021Article
- Article
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Multivariate Proteomic Tests for Prediction of Outcomes on Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy: The Modern Analytical Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Robust Distance Measures forCancer informatics · 2020Article
- Extending the information content of the MALDI analysis of biological fluids via multi-million shot analysis.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundModern genomic and proteomic profiling methods produce large amounts of data from tissue and blood-based samples that are of potential utility for improving patient care. However, the design of precision medicine tests for unmet clinical needs from this information in the small cohorts available for test discovery remains a challenging task. Obtaining reliable performance assessments at the earliest stages of test development can also be problematic. We describe a novel approach to classifier development designed to create clinically useful tests together with reliable estimates of their performance. The method incorporates elements of traditional and modern machine learning to facilitate the use of cohorts where the number of samples is less than the number of measured patient attributes. It is based on a hierarchy of classification and information abstraction and combines boosting, bagging, and strong dropout regularization.
resultsWe apply this dropout-regularized combination approach to two clinical problems in oncology using mRNA expression and associated clinical data and compare performance with other methods of classifier generation, including Random Forest. Performance of the new method is similar to or better than the Random Forest in the two classification tasks used for comparison. The dropout-regularized combination method also generates an effective classifier in a classification task with a known confounding variable. Most importantly, it provides a reliable estimate of test performance from a relatively small development set of samples.
conclusionsThe flexible dropout-regularized combination approach is able to produce tests tailored to particular clinical questions and mitigate known confounding effects. It allows the design of molecular diagnostic tests addressing particular clinical questions together with reliable assessment of whether test performance is likely to be fit-for-purpose in independent validation at the earliest stages of development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.