Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31195954›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Bayesian model selection for the Drosophila gap gene network.

Asif Zubair, I Gary Rosen, Sergey V Nuzhdin, Paul Marjoram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Asif ZubairMolecular and Computational Biology, USC, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2532, US. asifzuba@usc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0958-700X
I Gary RosenDepartment of Mathematics, USC, 3620 S. Vermont Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90089-2532, US.
Sergey V NuzhdinMolecular and Computational Biology, USC, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2532, US.
Paul MarjoramMolecular and Computational Biology, USC, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089-2532, US.

Funding

Multi-scale modeling of genetic variation in a developmental networkU01GM103804 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI DEPACE, ANGELA H, MARJORAM, PAUL · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
Drosophila Societies: Agent-Based Analysis of Behavioral Plasticity and GeneticsR01MH100879 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MARJORAM, PAUL, NUZHDIN, SERGEY V · 2013 to 2016
$2.0M
Allele Specific Regulation of Context Specific GRNR01GM128193 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCINTYRE, LAUREN M. · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
National Institutes of Health (US) UO1 GM103804; RO1 MH100879NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM128193NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM103804NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gap gene system controls the early cascade of the segmentation pathway in Drosophila melanogaster as well as other insects. Owing to its tractability and key role in embryo patterning, this system has been the focus for both computational modelers and experimentalists. The gap gene expression dynamics can be considered strictly as a one-dimensional process and modeled as a system of reaction-diffusion equations. While substantial progress has been made in modeling this phenomenon, there still remains a deficit of approaches to evaluate competing hypotheses. Most of the model development has happened in isolation and there has been little attempt to compare candidate models.

resultsThe Bayesian framework offers a means of doing formal model evaluation. Here, we demonstrate how this framework can be used to compare different models of gene expression. We focus on the Papatsenko-Levine formalism, which exploits a fractional occupancy based approach to incorporate activation of the gap genes by the maternal genes and cross-regulation by the gap genes themselves. The Bayesian approach provides insight about relationship between system parameters. In the regulatory pathway of segmentation, the parameters for number of binding sites and binding affinity have a negative correlation. The model selection analysis supports a stronger binding affinity for Bicoid compared to other regulatory edges, as shown by a larger posterior mean. The procedure doesn't show support for activation of Kruppel by Bicoid.

conclusionsWe provide an efficient solver for the general representation of the Papatsenko-Levine model. We also demonstrate the utility of Bayes factor for evaluating candidate models for spatial pattering models. In addition, by using the parallel tempering sampler, the convergence of Markov chains can be remarkably improved and robust estimates of Bayes factors obtained.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsBayes TheoremDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalLikelihood FunctionsMarkov ChainsModels, GeneticMonte Carlo MethodDrosophila ProteinsBayes factorBayesian model selectionGap genesParallel temperingReaction-diffusion equations

Identifiers

PMID31195954
PMCPMC6567646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.