Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31195825›Full record

Trial reportCirculation. Cardiovascular interventions2019

Long-Term Clinical Effectiveness of a Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions.

John A Laird, Peter A Schneider, Michael R Jaff, Marianne Brodmann, Thomas Zeller, D Chris Metzger, Prakash Krishnan, Dierk Scheinert, Antonio Micari, Hong Wang and 2 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 79 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
21.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01175850 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Trial of IN.PACT Admiral(TM) Drug Coated Balloon vs Standard PTA for the Treatment of SFA and Proximal Popliteal Arterial Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedtronic EndovascularRan2010 to 2017Enrolled331ConditionsPeripheral Arterial Disease (PAD)ArmsDrug-Coated Balloon (DCB), PTA Balloon: Balloon Angioplasty
NCT01566461 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Trial of IN.PACT (Paclitaxel) Admiral Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) vs. Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery (PPA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedtronic EndovascularRan2012 to 2018Enrolled331ConditionsFemoral Artery Stenosis, Popliteal Artery Stenosis, Femoral Artery Occlusion, Popliteal Artery OcclusionArmsDrug-Coated Balloon (DCB), PTA Balloon: Balloon Angioplasty
NCT05616520 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Efficacy for the Treatment of Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions Using Drug-coated PTA Balloon:a Real-world Registry Study(CARPLAY-DCB Study)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorXuanwu Hospital, BeijingRan2023 to 2025Enrolled838ConditionsPeripheral Arterial DiseaseArmsdrug-coated balloon
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Three-Year Results of the IN.PACT SFA Japan Trial Comparing Drug-Coated Balloons With Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2020
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Major Adverse Limb Events and Death After Successful Endovascular Revascularization: BEST-CLI Trial.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

John A LairdAdventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St Helena, CA (J.A.L.).
Peter A SchneiderKaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, HI (P.A.S.).
Michael R JaffHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.R.J.).
Marianne BrodmannMedical University, Graz, Austria (M.B.).
Thomas ZellerUniversitaets-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Germany (T.Z.).
D Chris MetzgerBallad Health Systems CVA Heart & Vascular Institute, Kingsport, TN (D.C.M.).
Prakash KrishnanThe Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY (P.K.).
Dierk ScheinertUniversity Hospital Leipzig, Germany (D.S.).
Antonio MicariGavazzeni Hospital Humanitas, Bergamo, Italy (A.M.).
Hong WangMedtronic Inc, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.M.).
Michele MastersMedtronic Inc, Santa Rosa, CA (H.W., M.M.).
Gunnar TepeRo Med Clinic Rosenheim, Germany (G.T.).
Medtronic (Ireland) · IEAdventist Heart Institute · USBallad Health · USHarvard University · USHumanitas Gavazzeni · ITift Rosenheim · DEKaiser Foundation Hospital · USMedical University of Graz · ATMount Sinai Hospital · USUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background While randomized trials have demonstrated the superiority of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease, the long-term durability of DCB angioplasty remains uncertain. Methods and Results IN.PACT SFA is a prospective, multicenter, randomized single-blinded trial (Randomized Trial of IN.PACT Admiral Paclitaxel-Coated Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty [PTA] Balloon Catheter vs Standard PTA for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery [SFA] and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery [PPA]) that enrolled 331 subjects with symptomatic (Rutherford 2-4) femoropopliteal lesions. Subjects were randomly assigned 2:1 to the IN.PACT Admiral DCB or PTA. Assessments through 5 years included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization, the primary safety end point, and major adverse events. Through 5 years, patients treated with the IN.PACT Admiral DCB demonstrated a sustained treatment effect with superior freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization when compared with PTA (Kaplan-Meier estimate of 74.5% versus 65.3%; log-rank P=0.020). The primary safety composite was achieved in 70.7% of subjects in the DCB and 59.6% in the PTA groups ( P=0.068). The major adverse event rate was 42.9% for DCB and 48.1% for PTA ( P=0.459). There were no device- or procedure-related deaths in either group as adjudicated by an independent and blinded Clinical Events Committee. Conclusions The IN.PACT SFA randomized trial demonstrates that the IN.PACT Admiral DCB continues to perform better than PTA through 5 years with higher freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization. The sustained safety and effectiveness profile of this DCB supports its use as a preferred treatment choice compared with PTA for femoropopliteal lesions. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01175850 (IN.PACT SFA phase I) and NCT01566461 (IN.PACT SFA phase II).

Indexed as

Coated Materials, BiocompatibleFemoral ArteryPopliteal ArteryVascular Access DevicesAmputation, SurgicalAngioplasty, BalloonCardiovascular AgentsHumansLimb SalvagePaclitaxelPeripheral Arterial DiseaseProgression-Free SurvivalProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSingle-Blind MethodTime FactorsCardiovascular AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePaclitaxelangioplastydrug-coated balloonspaclitaxelperipheral artery disease

Identifiers

PMID31195825
PMCPMC6636795
OpenAlexW2954074849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.