Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31195710›Full record

ReviewCells2019

Nanomodulation of Macrophages in Multiple Sclerosis.

Frances K Nally, Chiara De Santi, Claire E McCoy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A role for DICAMFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Microglia and metastases to the central nervous system: victim, ravager, or something else?Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Inflammation induces zebrafish regeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frances K NallyMolecular and Cellular Therapeutics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, 2 D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland. francesnally@rcsi.ie.
Chiara De SantiMolecular and Cellular Therapeutics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, 2 D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland. chiaradesanti@rcsi.ie.
Claire E McCoyMolecular and Cellular Therapeutics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, 2 D02 YN77 Dublin, Ireland. clairemccoy@rcsi.ie.ORCID 0000-0001-8710-896X
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating autoimmune disease primarily affecting young adults. Despite an unclear causal factor, symptoms and pathology arise from the infiltration of peripheral immune cells across the blood brain barrier. Accounting for the largest fraction of this infiltrate, macrophages are functionally heterogeneous innate immune cells capable of adopting either a pro or an anti-inflammatory phenotype, a phenomenon dependent upon cytokine milieu in the CNS. This functional plasticity is of key relevance in MS, where the pro-inflammatory state dominates the early stage, instructing demyelination and axonal loss while the later anti-inflammatory state holds a key role in promoting tissue repair and regeneration in later remission. This review highlights a potential therapeutic benefit of modulating macrophage polarisation to harness the anti-inflammatory and reparative state in MS. Here, we outline the role of macrophages in MS and look at the role of current FDA approved therapeutics in macrophage polarisation. Moreover, we explore the potential of particulate carriers as a novel strategy to manipulate polarisation states in macrophages, whilst examining how optimising macrophage uptake via nanoparticle size and functionalisation could offer a novel therapeutic approach for MS.

Indexed as

Central Nervous SystemDrug CarriersHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsMacrophagesMultiple SclerosisNanoparticlesDrug CarriersImmunologic FactorsImmunosuppressive AgentsCNSdrug deliveryexperimental autoimmune encephalomyelitisinflammationmacrophage polarisationmicrogliamicroparticlemonocytesmultiple sclerosisnanoparticle

Identifiers

PMID31195710
PMCPMC6628349
OpenAlexW2948495840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.