Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31195661›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Improving Nursing Staff Attitudes toward Vaccinations through Academic Detailing: The HProImmune Questionnaire as a Tool for Medical Management.

Andrea Tamburrano, Claudia Mellucci, Caterina Galletti, Daniela Vitale, Doriana Vallone, Andrea Barbara, Anna Sguera, Maurizio Zega, Gianfranco Damiani, Patrizia Laurenti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea TamburranoInstitute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito, 1, 00168 Roma, Italy. andrea.tamburrano01@icatt.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9903-2624
Claudia MellucciInstitute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito, 1, 00168 Roma, Italy. claudia.mellucci@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2794-2220
Caterina GallettiInstitute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito, 1, 00168 Roma, Italy. caterina.galletti@unicatt.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9317-0134
Daniela VitaleInstitute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito, 1, 00168 Roma, Italy. daniela_vitale.dv@libero.it.
Doriana ValloneInstitute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito, 1, 00168 Roma, Italy. doriana.vallone@guest.policlinicogemelli.it.
Andrea BarbaraInstitute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito, 1, 00168 Roma, Italy. andreabarbara89@hotmail.it.ORCID 0000-0001-5321-4537
Anna SgueraFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168 Roma, Italy. anna.sguera@policlinicogemelli.it.
Maurizio ZegaFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo Agostino Gemelli, 8, 00168 Roma, Italy. maurizio.zega@policlinicogemelli.it.
Gianfranco DamianiInstitute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito, 1, 00168 Roma, Italy. gianfranco.damiani@unicatt.it.
Patrizia LaurentiInstitute of Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Francesco Vito, 1, 00168 Roma, Italy. patrizia.laurenti@unicatt.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8532-0593
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccinations remain the most effective way of preventing infection, disease, and mortality. Public health institutions consequently recommend vaccines to target groups, including healthcare workers, who are considered to be more at risk of exposure and transmission. The aim of this cross-sectional study is to assess, through the administration of a questionnaire, the nursing staff's knowledge and attitude towards recommended vaccinations, and to explore the effects of a training course (carried out according to the academic detailing methodology) aimed at increasing operators' knowledge and outreach on recommended vaccinations among healthcare workers. A total of 85 HCWs (30 nursing coordinators and 55 nurses) completed the questionnaire. Results demonstrate a higher rate of agreement towards vaccinations in nursing staff answers (75%), if compared with results of other studies (62-63%). Statistically significant differences between nursing coordinators and nurses can be found. Regarding vaccination attitudes, nursing coordinators agreed in 86% of the answers on healthcare workers' vaccination vs 70% of nurses (

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsInfluenza VaccinesItalyMaleNursing StaffVaccinationYoung AdultInfluenza Vaccinesacademic detailingattitudehealthcare workersnursepreventive medicinequestionnairevaccination

Identifiers

PMID31195661
PMCPMC6603938
OpenAlexW2948505166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.