Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31195656›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Utility and Predictive Value of Human Standard Semen Parameters and Sperm DNA Dispersion for Fertility Potential.

Kamil Gill, Joanna Jakubik, Aleksandra Rosiak-Gill, Michał Kups, Mariusz Lukaszuk, Maciej Kurpisz, Monika Fraczek, Małgorzata Piasecka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical Update on Home Testing for Male Fertility.The world journal of men's health · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kamil GillDepartment of Histology and Developmental Biology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland. kamilgill@wp.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-1655-5065
Joanna JakubikDepartment of Histology and Developmental Biology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland. jakubik_joanna@wp.pl.
Aleksandra Rosiak-GillDepartment of Histology and Developmental Biology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland. rosiak.aleksandra@yahoo.com.
Michał KupsDepartment of Histology and Developmental Biology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland. michalkups1@gmail.com.
Mariusz LukaszukHealthcare Center Nowe Orlowo, 81-525 Gdynia, Poland. m.lukaszuk@gumed.edu.pl.
Maciej KurpiszInstitute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 60-479 Poznan, Poland. maciej.kurpisz@igcz.poznan.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-3275-3245
Monika FraczekInstitute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 60-479 Poznan, Poland. monika.fraczek@igcz.poznan.pl.
Małgorzata PiaseckaDepartment of Histology and Developmental Biology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland. mpiasecka@ipartner.com.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-5914-2121
Pomeranian Medical University · PLInstitute of Human Genetics · PLUniversity of Szczecin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because the assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) plays a key role in male fertility, our study was designed to find the relationships between SDF and standard semen parameters. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that 18% SDF is a prognostic parameter for discriminating between men with normal and abnormal standard semen parameters (n = 667). Men with > 18% SDF had significantly lower quality semen, a higher prevalence of abnormal semen characteristics, and a higher odds ratio for abnormal semen parameters compared to men with ≤ 18% SDF. An ROC analysis provided predictive values for age and semen parameters to distinguish between men with SDF > 18% and men with ≤ 18% SDF. SDF was positively correlated with male age and teratozoospermia index but negatively with sperm concentration, total number of spermatozoa, sperm morphology, progressive motility, and vitality. Our study shows that 18% SDF has a predictive value for distinguishing between men with normal and abnormal semen characteristics. Men with >18% SDF have a higher risk for abnormal semen parameters, while age and obtained semen parameters have a predictive value for SDF. There is a relationship between SDF and conventional sperm characteristics, and thus, SDF can be incorporated into male fertility assessment.

Indexed as

DNA FragmentationFertilityAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveSemenSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaYoung Adultmale fertility potentialsemen analysissperm DNA fragmentation

Identifiers

PMID31195656
PMCPMC6603873
OpenAlexW2948713011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.