Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31194808›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Validating a dimension of doubt in decision-making: A proposed endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Tanya Marton, Jack Samuels, Paul Nestadt, Janice Krasnow, Ying Wang, Marshall Shuler, Vidyulata Kamath, Vikram S Chib, Arnold Bakker, Gerald Nestadt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05546658 (Effects of Psilocybin in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05546658 early_phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Psilocybin in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2022 to 2027Enrolled35ConditionsObsessive-Compulsive DisorderArmsPsilocybin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evidence Accumulation and Neural Correlates of Uncertainty in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Transfer of information across repeated decisions in general and in obsessive-compulsive disorder.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Neural Substrates of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Brain Disorders.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tanya MartonDepartment of Neuroscience, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Jack SamuelsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Paul NestadtDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2479-703X
Janice KrasnowDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Ying WangDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Marshall ShulerDepartment of Neuroscience, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Vidyulata KamathDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Vikram S ChibDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Arnold BakkerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Gerald NestadtDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9461-5249
Johns Hopkins University · USKennedy Krieger Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doubt is subjective uncertainty about one's perceptions and recall. It can impair decision-making and is a prominent feature of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). We propose that evaluation of doubt during decision-making provides a useful endophenotype with which to study the underlying pathophysiology of OCD and potentially other psychopathologies. For the current study, we developed a new instrument, the Doubt Questionnaire, to clinically assess doubt. The random dot motion task was used to measure reaction time and subjective certainty, at varying levels of perceptual difficulty, in individuals who scored high and low on doubt, and in individuals with and without OCD. We found that doubt scores were significantly higher in OCD cases than controls. Drift diffusion modeling revealed that high doubt scores predicted slower evidence accumulation than did low doubt scores; and OCD diagnosis lower than controls. At higher levels of dot coherence, OCD participants exhibited significantly slower drift rates than did controls (q<0.05 for 30%, and 45% coherence; q<0.01 for 70% coherence). In addition, at higher levels of coherence, high doubt subjects exhibited even slower drift rates and reaction times than low doubt subjects (q<0.01 for 70% coherence). Moreover, under high coherence conditions, individuals with high doubt scores reported lower certainty in their decisions than did those with low doubt scores. We conclude that the Doubt Questionnaire is a useful instrument for measuring doubt. Compared to those with low doubt, those with high doubt accumulate evidence more slowly and report lower certainty when making decisions under conditions of low uncertainty. High doubt may affect the decision-making process in individuals with OCD. The dimensional doubt measure is a useful endophenotype for OCD research and could enable computationally rigorous and neurally valid understanding of decision-making and its pathological expression in OCD and other disorders.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEndophenotypesCase-Control StudiesHumansInternetObsessive-Compulsive DisorderSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID31194808
PMCPMC6564001
OpenAlexW2953149840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.