Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31194778›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Comparative effectiveness of second generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics based on nationwide database research in Hungary.

P Takács, P Czobor, L Fehér, J Gimesi-Országh, P Fadgyas-Freyler, M Bacskai, P Rakonczai, A Borsi, R Hegyi, T Németh and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P TakácsJanssen Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-5012-287X
P CzoborDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
L FehérJanssen-Cilag Hungary Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
J Gimesi-OrszághHealthware Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
P Fadgyas-FreylerHealthware Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
M BacskaiNational Health Insurance Fund Administration, Budapest, Hungary.
P RakonczaiNational Health Insurance Fund Administration, Budapest, Hungary.
A BorsiJanssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Beerse, Belgium.
R HegyiHealthware Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
T NémethNational Health Insurance Fund Administration, Budapest, Hungary.
J SermonJanssen Pharmaceutica N.V., Beerse, Belgium.
I BitterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Janssen (Belgium) · BEJanssen (Hungary) · HUSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchizophrenia is a severe condition that affects approximately 1% of the population. Certain elements of antipsychotic treatment can only be examined in large population, thus the need for population-based real-world analyses has been increasing. PATIENTS AND

methodsHungarian National Health Fund database includes all healthcare data of the population of Hungary. All patients diagnosed with schizophrenia between 01.01.2006 and 31.12.2015 were included in the study. We analyzed all patients with newly initiated second-generation antipsychotic during the inclusion period (01.01.2012-31.12.2013). Patients were followed for 2 years. All-cause treatment discontinuation served as the primary outcome of the study. Patients with newly initiated long-acting injectable treatments were further investigated in stratified analyses based on their previous treatment.

results106,624 patients had schizophrenia diagnosis during the study period. 12,232 patients met the inclusion criteria for newly initiating second-generation antipsychotic during the inclusion period. The proportion of patients still on treatment after 1 year for oral treatments varied between 17% (oral risperidone) and 31% (oral olanzapine) while the analogous data for long acting injectables were between 32% (risperidone long acting) and 64% (paliperidone long acting one monthly). The 2-year data were similarly in favor of long-actings. Median time to discontinuation in the oral group varied between 57 days (clozapine) and 121 days (olanzapine). The median time to discontinuation for long-actings was significantly longer: between 176 and 287 days; in case of paliperidone long acting, median was not reached during the observation period. Patients receiving long-acting treatment switched from another long-acting remained on the newly initiated treatment significantly longer than those switched from orals.

conclusionOur results indicate the superiority of second generation long-acting antipsychotics with regard to rates of treatment discontinuation and periods of persistence to the assigned medication.

Indexed as

Databases, PharmaceuticalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntipsychotic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansHungaryInfantInjectionsMaleMedication AdherenceSchizophreniaAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31194778
PMCPMC6563992
OpenAlexW2950034398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.