Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31194750›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Can clinical prediction models assess antibiotic need in childhood pneumonia? A validation study in paediatric emergency care.

Josephine van de Maat, Daan Nieboer, Matthew Thompson, Monica Lakhanpaul, Henriette Moll, Rianne Oostenbrink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Josephine van de MaatDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7351-4596
Daan NieboerDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Matthew ThompsonUniversity of Washington, Department of Family Medicine, Seattle, United States of America.
Monica LakhanpaulPopulation, Policy, Practice Program, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9855-2043
Henriette MollDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rianne OostenbrinkDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7919-8934
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLErasmus MC · NLGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Department of Health 515051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPneumonia is the most common bacterial infection in children at the emergency department (ED). Clinical prediction models for childhood pneumonia have been developed (using chest x-ray as their reference standard), but without implementation in clinical practice. Given current insights in the diagnostic limitations of chest x-ray, this study aims to validate these prediction models for a clinical diagnosis of pneumonia, and to explore their potential to guide decisions on antibiotic treatment at the ED.

methodsWe systematically identified clinical prediction models for childhood pneumonia and assessed their quality. We evaluated the validity of these models in two populations, using a clinical reference standard (1. definite/probable bacterial, 2. bacterial syndrome, 3. unknown bacterial/viral, 4. viral syndrome, 5. definite/probable viral), measuring performance by the ordinal c-statistic (ORC). Validation populations included prospectively collected data of children aged 1 month to 5 years attending the ED of Rotterdam (2012-2013) or Coventry (2005-2006) with fever and cough or dyspnoea.

resultsWe identified eight prediction models and could evaluate the validity of seven, with original good performance. In the Dutch population 22/248 (9%) had a bacterial infection, in Coventry 53/301 (17%), antibiotic prescription was 21% and 35% respectively. Three models predicted a higher risk in children with bacterial infections than in those with viral disease (ORC ≥0.55) and could identify children at low risk of bacterial infection.

conclusionsThree clinical prediction models for childhood pneumonia could discriminate fairly well between a clinical reference standard of bacterial versus viral infection. However, they all require the measurement of biomarkers, raising questions on the exact target population when implementing these models in clinical practice. Moreover, choosing optimal thresholds to guide antibiotic prescription is challenging and requires careful consideration of potential harms and benefits.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision RulesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsBiomarkersChild, PreschoolCoughDecision Support TechniquesEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalEmergency TreatmentFemaleFeverForecastingHumansInfantMaleAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31194750
PMCPMC6563975
OpenAlexW2951609865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.